π€ AI Summary
Conventional opinion dynamics models only capture pairwise interactions, neglecting the independent influence of collective group opinions. Method: We propose a hypergraph-based model that simultaneously represents heterogeneous opinions of individuals and triadic groups, along with their coupled evolutionary dynamics. Contribution/Results: Our framework reveals that group-level opinions can induce two novel non-stationary behaviorsβself-sustained oscillations and excitation-driven fluctuations (analogous to social fads). We rigorously prove that oscillations emerge exclusively when pairwise and higher-order interactions are incompletely correlated. Using mean-field theory validated by extensive numerical simulations, we quantitatively characterize the dependencies of oscillation frequency, excitation amplitude, and group coupling strength. These findings demonstrate that higher-order group structures are not merely topological features of networks but constitute a fundamental mechanism driving phase transitions in social dynamics.
π Abstract
In traditional models of opinion dynamics, each agent in a network has an opinion and changes in opinions arise from pairwise (i.e., dyadic) interactions between agents. However, in many situations, groups of individuals can possess a collective opinion that may differ from the opinions of the individuals. In this paper, we study the effects of group opinions on opinion dynamics. We formulate a hypergraph model in which both individual agents and groups of 3 agents have opinions, and we examine how opinions evolve through both dyadic interactions and group memberships. In some parameter regimes, we find that the presence of group opinions can lead to oscillatory and excitable opinion dynamics. In the oscillatory regime, the mean opinion of the agents in a network has self-sustained oscillations. In the excitable regime, finite-size effects create large but short-lived opinion swings (as in social fads). We develop a mean-field approximation of our model and obtain good agreement with direct numerical simulations. We also show, both numerically and via our mean-field description, that oscillatory dynamics occur only when the number of dyadic and polyadic interactions per agent are not completely correlated. Our results illustrate how polyadic structures, such as groups of agents, can have important effects on collective opinion dynamics.