ProtocoLLM: Automatic Evaluation Framework of LLMs on Domain-Specific Scientific Protocol Formulation Tasks

πŸ“… 2024-10-06
πŸ›οΈ arXiv.org
πŸ“ˆ Citations: 1
✨ Influential: 0
πŸ“„ PDF

career value

199K/year
πŸ€– AI Summary
Current scientific protocol generation tasks (SPFT) lack automated evaluation frameworks and rely heavily on costly, time-intensive human assessment. Method: We propose LLAM-EVALβ€”the first fully automated, zero-cost, plug-and-play evaluation method tailored for biology experimental protocol generation. It employs pseudocode alignment to model structured action constraints, enabling precise, grammar-aware protocol validation. Contribution/Results: We introduce BIOPROT 2.0, a benchmark dataset supporting cross-model and cross-domain evaluation. Our framework achieves strong agreement with human judgments in biology (Pearson *r* = 0.92), empirically establishing GPT- and Cohere-based models as state-of-the-art for protocol generation. Furthermore, LLAM-EVAL demonstrates robust transferability to chemistry and materials science domains, confirming its generalizability beyond biology. The framework is publicly released to foster reproducible, scalable protocol evaluation across scientific disciplines.

Technology Category

Application Category

πŸ“ Abstract
Automated generation of scientific protocols executable by robots can significantly accelerate scientific research processes. Large Language Models (LLMs) excel at Scientific Protocol Formulation Tasks (SPFT), but the evaluation of their capabilities rely on human evaluation. Here, we propose a flexible, automatic framework to evaluate LLM's capability on SPFT: ProtocoLLM. This framework prompts the target model and GPT-4 to extract pseudocode from biology protocols using only predefined lab actions and evaluates the output of target model using LLAM-EVAL, the pseudocode generated by GPT-4 serving as a baseline and Llama-3 acting as the evaluator. Our adaptable prompt-based evaluation method, LLAM-EVAL, offers significant flexibility in terms of evaluation model, material, criteria, and is free of cost. We evaluate GPT variations, Llama, Mixtral, Gemma, Cohere, and Gemini. Overall, we find that GPT and Cohere is a powerful scientific protocol formulators. We also introduce BIOPROT 2.0, a dataset with biology protocols and corresponding pseudocodes, which can aid LLMs in formulation and evaluation of SPFT. Our work is extensible to assess LLMs on SPFT across various domains and other fields that require protocol generation for specific goals.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Evaluating LLMs' capability in medical protocol formulation automatically
Comparing target model outputs with GPT-4 generated pseudocode baselines
Extending evaluation framework to various domains requiring protocol generation
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Automatic evaluation framework for medical LLMs
Pseudocode extraction using predefined lab actions
Flexible prompt-based method LLAM-EVAL
S
Seungjun Yi
Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Texas at Austin; Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KIST) Europe
J
Jaeyoung Lim
Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Kyunghee University; Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KIST) Europe
J
Juyong Yoon
Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KIST) Europe