Implicit Manipulation for Skill Selection in LLM Agents with Semantic Matching

๐Ÿ“… 2026-09-01
๐Ÿ“ˆ Citations: 0
โœจ Influential: 0
๐Ÿ“„ PDF
๐Ÿค– AI Summary
ๆœฌๆ–‡ๆๅ‡บไบ†ไธ€็งๅŸบไบŽ่ฏญไน‰ๅŒน้…็š„้šๅผๆŠ€่ƒฝ้€‰ๆ‹ฉๆ“็บตๆ–นๆณ•ISM๏ผŒ้€š่ฟ‡่”ๅˆๅก‘้€ ็›ฎๆ ‡ๆŠ€่ƒฝๅ…ƒๆ•ฐๆฎๅ’Œๅฏ้‡็”จๆ็คบๆฅๆ้ซ˜ๆ”ปๅ‡ป่€…้€‰ๅฎšๆŠ€่ƒฝ็š„้€‰ๆ‹ฉ็އ๏ผŒๅŒๆ—ถไฟๆŒ่‡ช็„ถ่ฏญ่จ€่กจ่พพใ€‚
๐Ÿ“ Abstract
Skill selection is a key stage in LLM-agent workflows, determining which installed skill should handle a user request. Existing attacks on this stage primarily rely on explicit prompt injection or instruction-level steering, which can expose recognizable manipulation signals. In this work, we identify a new implicit attack surface for skill selection: even when the user prompt and skill description appear benign in isolation, their semantic relationship can still be strategically shaped to favor an attacker-chosen skill. Based on this observation, we present Implicit Skill-Selection Manipulation via Semantic Matching (ISM), which jointly shapes target-skill metadata and reusable prompts to manipulate skill selection without explicit selection instructions. Specifically, we develop a three-stage strategy to broaden semantic coverage, strengthen target distinctiveness, and preserve natural prompt wording. Across four task domains and eight selector models, ISM increases the average target-selection rate (TSR) from 15.2% to 63.5%. In a matched comparison, ISM achieves a 73.5% TSR, only 9.8 percentage points below Explicit Steering. Human reviewers block ISM in only 2.9% of judgments, versus 91.4% for Explicit Steering, while five LLM-based inspectors pass ISM at an average rate of 82.9%, versus 37.4% for Explicit Steering. Moreover, ISM remains effective against PPL-W, Llama Prompt Guard 2, and PIGuard.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Skill Selection
Semantic Matching
Implicit Attack
LLM Agents
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Implicit Skill-Selection Manipulation
Semantic Matching
Target-Skill Metadata
Reusable Prompts
Skill Selection
๐Ÿ”Ž Similar Papers
2024-06-07arXiv.orgCitations: 3
2023-10-29International Conference on Machine LearningCitations: 82
Q
Qikai Wang
University of Electronic Science and Technology of China
Y
Yongzhao Zhang
University of Electronic Science and Technology of China
Z
Zhiwei Chen
University of Electronic Science and Technology of China
Yimiao Sun
Yimiao Sun
Tsinghua University
Internet of ThingsMobile ComputingWireless LocalizationEmbeded SystemWireless Sensing
J
Jiguo Yu
University of Electronic Science and Technology of China
Xiaosong Zhang
Xiaosong Zhang
Tencent