The Future of Safety for SaMD

📅 2026-09-14
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
论文探讨了如何通过形式化验证方法提高软件驱动的人造器官的安全性,该方法能证明代码在所有允许执行情况下的正确性。
📝 Abstract
An artificial organ carries failure consequences on the scale of an aircraft or a reactor, but the software driving it is rarely held to the same standard. Teams building them rely on testing, which only reaches the failure modes someone thought of in advance. In a pump or controller that runs inside a patient for months, the dangerous cases are the ones nobody anticipated. Formal verification closes that gap. Applied to the device's software, it proves the code meets its specification for every execution that specification allows, and where a proof fails, it returns the exact input sequence that breaks it. The same methods already protect rail, aviation, and nuclear control systems, and they extend the IEC 62304 lifecycle that a manufacturer already follows rather than replacing it. In this paper, we explore how to apply formal verification to artificial organs, stage by stage, and what each technique actually guarantees about the device.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

SaMD
safety
formal verification
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

formal verification
artificial organs
IEC 62304
software safety
Rhea Malhotra
Rhea Malhotra
Stanford University
RoboticsComputer Science
Tanya Sharma
Tanya Sharma
K
Krisha Patel
S
Satvika Sharma
H
Heena Purkait
Fresenius Medical Care
M
Mehak Nehal Makhija
Baxter Healthcare
A
Aellison Cassimiro
Runtime Verification Team
E
Everett Hildenbrandt
Runtime Verification Team
Palina Tolmach
Palina Tolmach
Nanyang Technological University
J
Jaidev Shastri
Virginia Tech University