Designing Signals for Deterrence

📅 2026-09-13
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
本文提出了一种新的信号设计方法,通过预先承诺根据实际决心采取成本行动,以在有限观众成本下提高防御方收益并降低战争可能性。
📝 Abstract
States and alliances spend enormous resources signaling resolve to deter adversaries. Two canonical strategies are burning money (sunk costs) and burning bridges (audience costs). Large audience costs can deter effectively, but they may be infeasible and, even when feasible, can increase the likelihood of war relative to burning money. We propose a signaling design in which the defender retains the flexibility to fight or back down but commits ex ante, before learning its resolve, to a rule mapping realized resolve into costly actions. When audience costs are limited, this design raises defender payoffs while reducing the likelihood of war. We discuss implementation through laws and automated algorithms. We also characterize defender payoffs when audience costs are chosen endogenously from a feasible set, showing that lowering the maximum feasible audience cost can raise defender payoffs, and we compare these payoffs with those under the standard burning-money setting without commitment.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

signaling
deterrence
audience costs
resolve
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

signaling design
commitment
audience costs
automated algorithms
H
Hiroto Sawada
Department of Politics, Princeton University
R
Raphael Boleslavsky
Department of Business Economics & Public Policy, Kelley School of Business, Indiana University
K
Kristopher W. Ramsay
Department of Politics, Princeton University
M
Mehdi Shadmehr
Department of Public Policy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill