Prediction-Market Seed Capital Recovery from Noise-Dominant Flow

πŸ“… 2026-09-12
πŸ“ˆ Citations: 0
✨ Influential: 0
πŸ“„ PDF
πŸ€– AI Summary
η ”η©Άι€šθΏ‡εΌ•ε…₯εŸΊδΊŽε―θ§‚ε―Ÿζ”Άη›Šζ–Ήε‘ηš„ιžθ΄Ÿζ”Άθ΄ΉζœΊεˆΆοΌŒε³η§ε­θ΅„ζœ¬ζ΅εŠ¨(SCF),ζ₯提高θ‡ͺεŠ¨εŒ–ι’„ζ΅‹εΈ‚εœΊδΈ­ι’„δ»˜θ΅„ζœ¬ηš„ε›žζ”ΆηŽ‡οΌŒεŒζ—Άε‡ε°‘ε―ΉηŸ₯ζƒ…ε‚δΈŽθ€…ηš„ε½±ε“γ€‚
πŸ“ Abstract
Automated prediction markets require sponsors to prefund liquidity before observing order flow, creating a financing challenge at launch. We study whether nonnegative charges conditioned on observable payoff direction can improve recovery of this prefunded capital while limiting their effect on informed participation. We develop Seed Capital Flow (SCF), a direction-conditioned levy, in a stylized binary cost-function market with informed and liquidity-motivated traders. When order composition differs across directions, SCF concentrates the permitted fee burden on the direction with relatively more liquidity-motivated flow, whereas a uniform fee spreads it across both directions. Under a sufficiently tight common retention constraint, this allocation yields higher expected recovery capacity and can make additional liquidity choices financially viable. Synthetic numerical audits examine robustness to alternative flow patterns, stochastic arrivals, and label misspecification. The results characterize a mechanism-design tradeoff rather than an empirical prediction: the market remains prefunded, recovery is expected rather than guaranteed, and the analysis is limited to an opening-cohort setting.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

prediction markets
seed capital recovery
liquidity provision
nonnegative charges
informed participation
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Seed Capital Flow
direction-conditioned levy
liquidity-motivated flow
capital recovery
πŸ”Ž Similar Papers