Adjusting for Many Covariates in Randomized Clinical Trials with GLMs: Bias Reduction by Jackknife and Practical Guidance

📅 2026-09-12
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
本文针对随机临床试验中调整大量协变量可能导致的偏差问题,提出了一种基于广义线性模型的新型刀切法(JASA及JASACal),有效减少了高维设置下的估计偏差。
📝 Abstract
Adjusting for baseline covariates has become standard practice in analyzing randomized clinical trials. In the low-dimensional setting, it is well understood that covariate adjustment through a parametric working model can sometimes be more efficient than the unadjusted difference-in-mean estimator. However, when the number of adjusted covariates is large relative to the sample size $n$, a naïve adjustment may introduce excessive bias, leading to invalid statistical inference. The current literature that tries to resolve this issue is either limited to linear working models or relies on sample splitting, which may raise concerns about the replicability of RCT analyses. In this paper, we devise a novel jackknife-based approach to covariate adjustment through generalized linear models (GLMs), which we term as JAckknife Score-based Adjustment (JASA), together with its calibrated version JASACal. By employing a nuanced jackknife strategy, JASA and JASACal avoid sample splitting and make full use of the data, while ensuring that the bias of JASA or JASACal is still negligible even when the number of adjusted covariates is large compared to $n$. JASA also encompasses state-of-the-art adjusted estimators through linear working models as a special case. Through extensive simulation experiments and a real data analysis, we demonstrate that JASA or JASACal can adjust for a much greater number of covariates than existing benchmarks. These empirical results also shed some new light on practical guidance for covariate adjustment with GLMs. Both JASA and JASACal have been incorporated into our R package HOIFCar available from CRAN. The package HOIFCar is developed to serve as a user-friendly option for covariate adjustment in RCTs, in particular when practitioners hope to adjust for a large number of covariates.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Covariate Adjustment
Randomized Clinical Trials
Bias Reduction
Generalized Linear Models
Jackknife
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Jackknife
Covariate Adjustment
Generalized Linear Models
High-Dimensional Data
Bias Reduction
🔎 Similar Papers
S
Sihui Zhao
School of Mathematical Sciences, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
Xinbo Wang
Xinbo Wang
Facebook Inc.
5GCloud Radio Access NetworksOptical Networks
Y
Yongyong Ren
Institute of Bioinformatics, Shanghai Academy of Experimental Medicine, Shanghai, China; SJTU-Yale Joint Center for Biostatistics and Data Science, Technical Center for Digital Medicine, National Center for Translational Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
Hongyu Zhao
Hongyu Zhao
Yale University
First interestSecond interest
Hui Lu
Hui Lu
Department of Computer Science and Engineering (CSE), the University of Texas at Arlington (UTA)
Cloud ComputingVirtualizationFile and Storage SystemsComputer NetworksComputer Systems
L
Lin Liu
School of Mathematical Sciences, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China; SJTU-Yale Joint Center for Biostatistics and Data Science, Technical Center for Digital Medicine, National Center for Translational Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China; Institute of Natural Sciences, MOE-LSC, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China