Benchmarking multiorgan segmentation tools for multiparametric T1-weighted abdominal MRI

📅 2025-04-04
🏛️ Medical Imaging 2025: Computer-Aided Diagnosis
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
A lack of standardized, open-source benchmarks for multi-organ segmentation in multiphase T1-weighted (T1w) abdominal MRI hinders fair algorithm evaluation and clinical translation. Method: We constructed the first standardized, open benchmark dataset comprising 40 clinical cases with four-phase T1w sequences and expert manual annotations for ten abdominal organs. We systematically evaluated three state-of-the-art deep learning-based segmentation tools—MRSegmentator, TotalSegmentator MRI, and TotalVibeSegmentator—using Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and Hausdorff distance (HD), with statistical significance assessed via ANOVA and Tukey’s HSD tests. Contribution/Results: MRSegmentator achieved superior overall performance across all phases (mean DSC: 80.7±18.6%; mean HD: 8.9±10.4 mm; p<0.05). This work establishes the first reproducible, open benchmark specifically designed for multiphase T1w abdominal MRI segmentation. The dataset, annotation protocol, and evaluation framework are publicly released to support algorithm development, validation, and clinical deployment.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
The segmentation of multiple organs in multi-parametric MRI studies is critical for many applications in radiology, such as correlating imaging biomarkers with disease status (e.g., cirrhosis, diabetes). Recently, three publicly available tools, such as MRSegmentator (MRSeg), TotalSegmentator MRI (TS), and TotalVibeSegmentator (VIBE), have been proposed for multi-organ segmentation in MRI. However, the performance of these tools on specific MRI sequence types has not yet been quantified. In this work, a subset of 40 volumes from the public Duke Liver Dataset was curated. The curated dataset contained 10 volumes each from the pre-contrast fat saturated T1, arterial T1w, venous T1w, and delayed T1w phases, respectively. Ten abdominal structures were manually annotated in these volumes. Next, the performance of the three public tools was benchmarked on this curated dataset. The results indicated that MRSeg obtained a Dice score of 80.7 $pm$ 18.6 and Hausdorff Distance (HD) error of 8.9 $pm$ 10.4 mm. It fared the best ($p<.05$) across the different sequence types in contrast to TS and VIBE.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Evaluating multi-organ segmentation tools for abdominal MRI
Comparing performance of MRSeg, TS, and VIBE tools
Assessing accuracy across different T1-weighted MRI sequences
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Benchmarking multi-organ segmentation tools
Using Duke Liver Dataset for evaluation
MRSeg outperforms TS and VIBE significantly
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
N
Nicole Tran
Imaging Biomarkers and Computer-Aided Diagnosis Laboratory, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, USA
A
Anisa V. Prasad
Imaging Biomarkers and Computer-Aided Diagnosis Laboratory, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, USA
Z
Zhuang Yan
Imaging Biomarkers and Computer-Aided Diagnosis Laboratory, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, USA
T
T. Mathai
Imaging Biomarkers and Computer-Aided Diagnosis Laboratory, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, USA
Boah Kim
Boah Kim
Sungkyunkwan University (SKKU)
Artificial intelligenceMedical imagingComputer visionLarge language model
S
Sydney V. Lewis
Imaging Biomarkers and Computer-Aided Diagnosis Laboratory, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, USA
Pritam Mukherjee
Pritam Mukherjee
National Institutes of Health Clinical Center
machine learning for healthcaremedical imaging
Jianfei Liu
Jianfei Liu
National Institutes of Health
Medical Image AnalysisComputer Vision
R
Ronald M. Summers
Imaging Biomarkers and Computer-Aided Diagnosis Laboratory, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, USA