🤖 AI Summary
This study addresses the challenge of conducting inference in settings where the marginal distributions of multivariate responses are difficult to specify accurately—such as in longitudinal data or high-dimensional heteroscedastic regression—under the assumption that the conditional mean model is correctly specified. The authors develop a √n-consistent estimator via a penalized estimating equation and propose a hypothesis testing procedure focused on low-dimensional subvectors of parameters. A key innovation is the introduction of a cross-fitted covariance calibration mechanism, which substantially reduces the sensitivity of the test to misspecification of the nuisance covariance function. The resulting test statistic follows an asymptotic chi-squared distribution, achieving robustness by controlling Type I error while significantly enhancing statistical power for efficient and reliable inference.
📝 Abstract
We study hypothesis testing for penalized estimators in settings where the full marginal distribution of a multivariate response is difficult to specify, such as longitudinal data with correlated measurements or high-dimensional heteroscedastic regression. Assuming that the conditional mean model is correctly specified, we establish that the penalized estimating equations admit a $\sqrt{n}$-consistent solution, even when the working covariance structure is misspecified. Our inferential target is a low-dimensional subvector of parameters associated with the mean model. We show that the resulting test statistic converges to a $χ^2$ distribution, and that its asymptotic power depends on the nuisance covariance function. To mitigate this dependence, we propose estimating the covariance function via cross-fitting, which provides a calibrated and robust procedure for inference.