From Prompting to Preference Optimization: A Comparative Study of LLM-based Automated Essay Scoring

📅 2026-03-06
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This study addresses the lack of systematic comparison among large language model (LLM)-based automated essay scoring (AES) approaches tailored for English as a second language (L2) writing, particularly regarding their trade-offs in accuracy, cost, and robustness. The authors establish the first unified benchmark for IELTS Writing Task 2 and comprehensively evaluate four prominent LLM-based AES paradigms: encoder fine-tuning, prompt engineering, instruction tuning combined with retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), and supervised fine-tuning integrated with direct preference optimization (DPO) and RAG. Their experiments reveal fundamental trade-offs among accuracy, efficiency, and stability across these methods. The optimal configuration—k-shot supervised fine-tuning with RAG—achieves an F1 score of 93%, significantly outperforming baseline approaches and demonstrating the effectiveness and superiority of integrating fine-tuning with retrieval-augmented strategies for L2 AES.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have recently reshaped Automated Essay Scoring (AES), yet prior studies typically examine individual techniques in isolation, limiting understanding of their relative merits for English as a Second Language (L2) writing. To bridge this gap, we presents a comprehensive comparison of major LLM-based AES paradigms on IELTS Writing Task~2. On this unified benchmark, we evaluate four approaches: (i) encoder-based classification fine-tuning, (ii) zero- and few-shot prompting, (iii) instruction tuning and Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), and (iv) Supervised Fine-Tuning combined with Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) and RAG. Our results reveal clear accuracy-cost-robustness trade-offs across methods, the best configuration, integrating k-SFT and RAG, achieves the strongest overall results with F1-Score 93%. This study offers the first unified empirical comparison of modern LLM-based AES strategies for English L2, promising potential in auto-grading writing tasks. Code is public at https://github.com/MinhNguyenDS/LLM_AES-EnL2
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Automated Essay Scoring
Large Language Models
Second Language Writing
Comparative Study
IELTS Writing
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Automated Essay Scoring
Large Language Models
Preference Optimization
Retrieval-Augmented Generation
Supervised Fine-Tuning
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
M
Minh Hoang Nguyen
Faculty of Information Technology, University of Science, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam; Vietnam National University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
V
Vu Hoang Pham
Faculty of Information Technology, University of Science, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam; Vietnam National University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
X
Xuan Thanh Huynh
Faculty of Information Technology, University of Science, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam; Vietnam National University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
P
Phuc Hong Mai
Faculty of Information Technology, University of Science, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam; Vietnam National University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
V
Vinh The Nguyen
Faculty of Information Technology, University of Science, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam; Vietnam National University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
Q
Quang Nhut Huynh
Faculty of Information Technology, University of Science, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam; Vietnam National University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
Huy Tien Nguyen
Huy Tien Nguyen
Lecturer of Computer Science, University of Science, Ho Chi Minh city
Natural language processingData miningMultimodal AI
Tung Le
Tung Le
Dr, , Lecturer.
Natural Language ProcessingVisual Question Answering