Black Swan: Abductive and Defeasible Video Reasoning in Unpredictable Events

📅 2024-12-07
🏛️ arXiv.org
📈 Citations: 1
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Vision-language models (VLMs) exhibit limited abductive and defeasible reasoning capabilities when confronted with atypical, real-world video events—highlighting a critical gap in causal understanding beyond statistical pattern recognition. Method: We introduce BlackSwanSuite, the first benchmark dedicated to non-canonical video events, designed to rigorously evaluate dynamic belief revision and implicit causal inference under constrained visual inputs and hypothesis-updating tasks. Contribution/Results: BlackSwanSuite features a multimodal, formalized framework integrating abductive and defeasible logic, with 3,800+ multiple-choice, 4,900+ open-ended generation, and 6,700+ true/false questions across 1,655 rare-event videos. Evaluation on state-of-the-art VLMs—including GPT-4o, Gemini 1.5 Pro, and LLaVA-Video—reveals up to a 32% human–model performance gap. The benchmark is fully open-sourced, accompanied by a public leaderboard, to advance robust causal reasoning research in VLMs.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
The commonsense reasoning capabilities of vision-language models (VLMs), especially in abductive reasoning and defeasible reasoning, remain poorly understood. Most benchmarks focus on typical visual scenarios, making it difficult to discern whether model performance stems from keen perception and reasoning skills, or reliance on pure statistical recall. We argue that by focusing on atypical events in videos, clearer insights can be gained on the core capabilities of VLMs. Explaining and understanding such out-of-distribution events requires models to extend beyond basic pattern recognition and regurgitation of their prior knowledge. To this end, we introduce BlackSwanSuite, a benchmark for evaluating VLMs' ability to reason about unexpected events through abductive and defeasible tasks. Our tasks artificially limit the amount of visual information provided to models while questioning them about hidden unexpected events, or provide new visual information that could change an existing hypothesis about the event. We curate a comprehensive benchmark suite comprising over 3,800 MCQ, 4,900 generative and 6,700 yes/no questions, spanning 1,655 videos. After extensively evaluating various state-of-the-art VLMs, including GPT-4o and Gemini 1.5 Pro, as well as open-source VLMs such as LLaVA-Video, we find significant performance gaps of up to 32% from humans on these tasks. Our findings reveal key limitations in current VLMs, emphasizing the need for enhanced model architectures and training strategies. Our data and leaderboard is available at blackswan.cs.ubc.ca.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Evaluating VLMs' reasoning in unpredictable video events
Assessing abductive and defeasible reasoning beyond typical scenarios
Identifying performance gaps between VLMs and humans
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

BlackSwanSuite benchmark for unexpected events
Abductive and defeasible reasoning tasks
Limited visual information for evaluation
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
Aditya Chinchure
Aditya Chinchure
University of British Columbia
Vision and LanguageFairness and Bias
Sahithya Ravi
Sahithya Ravi
PhD student
Natural language ProcessingVision and LanguageCommonsense Reasoning
R
Raymond T. Ng
University of British Columbia, Vector Institute for AI
V
V. Shwartz
University of British Columbia, Vector Institute for AI
B
Boyang Albert Li
Nanyang Technological University
Leonid Sigal
Leonid Sigal
Professor, University of British Columbia
Computer VisionMachine Learning