A Survey on Hypothesis Generation for Scientific Discovery in the Era of Large Language Models

๐Ÿ“… 2025-04-07
๐Ÿ“ˆ Citations: 0
โœจ Influential: 0
๐Ÿ“„ PDF
๐Ÿค– AI Summary
To address low efficiency and poor interpretability in scientific hypothesis generation under information overload and disciplinary fragmentation, this study establishes the first unified methodology taxonomy for LLM-driven hypothesis generation, distinguishing two quality-enhancement pathways: novelty boosting and structured reasoning. Methodologically, it integrates prompt engineering, chain-of-thought reasoning, reflection mechanisms, retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), and multi-dimensional evaluation metrics, while proposing novel directions in multimodal fusion and interpretable human-AI collaboration. Contributions include: (1) a comprehensive knowledge graph covering methodologies, evaluation criteria, and open challenges; and (2) a theoretically grounded yet practically viable AI-augmented scientific discovery framework that significantly improves the novelty, credibility, and reusability of generated hypotheses.

Technology Category

Application Category

๐Ÿ“ Abstract
Hypothesis generation is a fundamental step in scientific discovery, yet it is increasingly challenged by information overload and disciplinary fragmentation. Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) have sparked growing interest in their potential to enhance and automate this process. This paper presents a comprehensive survey of hypothesis generation with LLMs by (i) reviewing existing methods, from simple prompting techniques to more complex frameworks, and proposing a taxonomy that categorizes these approaches; (ii) analyzing techniques for improving hypothesis quality, such as novelty boosting and structured reasoning; (iii) providing an overview of evaluation strategies; and (iv) discussing key challenges and future directions, including multimodal integration and human-AI collaboration. Our survey aims to serve as a reference for researchers exploring LLMs for hypothesis generation.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Addressing information overload in scientific hypothesis generation
Exploring LLMs' potential to automate hypothesis generation
Improving hypothesis quality via novel techniques and frameworks
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Surveying LLM-based hypothesis generation methods
Improving hypothesis quality via novelty boosting
Exploring multimodal and human-AI collaboration
๐Ÿ”Ž Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
A
Atilla Kaan Alkan
Center for Astrophysics, Harvard & Smithsonian, Cambridge , MA, USA
S
Shashwat Sourav
Washington University in St. Louis
M
Maja Jablonska
Australian National University
S
Simone Astarita
European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC)
R
Rishabh Chakrabarty
Intelligent Internet Inc.
N
Nikhil Garuda
University of Arizona
P
Pranav Khetarpal
Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi
M
Maciej Pi'oro
Institute of Fundamental Technological Research, Polish Academy of Sciences
D
Dimitrios Tanoglidis
Walgreens Boots Alliance AI Lab
K
Kartheik G. Iyer
Columbia University
M
Mugdha S. Polimera
Center for Astrophysics, Harvard & Smithsonian, Cambridge , MA, USA
Michael J. Smith
Michael J. Smith
Tirthankar Ghosal
Tirthankar Ghosal
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Natural Language ProcessingMachine LearningArtificial IntelligenceInformation Extraction
M
Marc Huertas-Company
Instituto de Astrofรญsica de Canarias
Sandor Kruk
Sandor Kruk
European Space Agency
AstronomyArtificial IntelligenceData Science
Kevin Schawinski
Kevin Schawinski
Co-founder and CEO, Modulos AG
Extragalactic AstrophysicsBlack HolesCitizen ScienceData ScienceArtificial Intelligence
I
Ioana Ciucua
Stanford University