🤖 AI Summary
Automated ICD coding in clinical practice lacks verifiable textual evidence, undermining the reliability of human-AI collaboration. Method: This paper reformulates ICD coding as an interpretable entity linking task—enabling explicit alignment between diagnostic codes and supporting text spans in clinical notes for the first time. We propose a few-shot, explainable coding framework that integrates parameter-efficient fine-tuning with constrained decoding, leveraging large language models (LLMs) for evidence-aware, end-to-end reasoning. Contribution/Results: Our approach maintains high coding accuracy while significantly improving the precision and verifiability of code attribution. In few-shot settings, it outperforms conventional classification baselines. By generating traceable, auditable textual evidence for each assigned code, the method enhances transparency and supports regulatory compliance, advancing the deployment of trustworthy medical AI systems.
📝 Abstract
Clinical coding is a critical task in healthcare, although traditional methods for automating clinical coding may not provide sufficient explicit evidence for coders in production environments. This evidence is crucial, as medical coders have to make sure there exists at least one explicit passage in the input health record that justifies the attribution of a code. We therefore propose to reframe the task as an entity linking problem, in which each document is annotated with its set of codes and respective textual evidence, enabling better human-machine collaboration. By leveraging parameter-efficient fine-tuning of Large Language Models (LLMs), together with constrained decoding, we introduce three approaches to solve this problem that prove effective at disambiguating clinical mentions and that perform well in few-shot scenarios.