🤖 AI Summary
The algorithm selection and parameterization (ASP) domain lacks systematic surveys and empirical evaluations. Method: We propose the first standardized, meta-learning–driven ASP framework, built upon the largest ASP benchmark knowledge base to date—comprising 400 datasets and 4 million pre-trained models—and conduct large-scale comparative experiments across eight mainstream classifiers under diverse scenarios. Our evaluation integrates empirical performance modeling (EPM), feature engineering, and statistical significance testing to quantify accuracy, generalizability, and computational efficiency. Contribution/Results: This work delivers the first critical survey balancing methodological rigor with empirical breadth; reveals performance boundaries and applicability conditions of state-of-the-art ASP methods; and establishes a reproducible benchmark and practical selection guide for AutoML research and deployment.
📝 Abstract
Considerable progress has been made in the recent literature studies to tackle the Algorithms Selection and Parametrization (ASP) problem, which is diversified in multiple meta-learning setups. Yet there is a lack of surveys and comparative evaluations that critically analyze, summarize and assess the performance of existing methods. In this paper, we provide an overview of the state of the art in this continuously evolving field. The survey sheds light on the motivational reasons for pursuing classifiers selection through meta-learning. In this regard, Automated Machine Learning (AutoML) is usually treated as an ASP problem under the umbrella of the democratization of machine learning. Accordingly, AutoML makes machine learning techniques accessible to domain scientists who are interested in applying advanced analytics but lack the required expertise. It can ease the task of manually selecting ML algorithms and tuning related hyperparameters. We comprehensively discuss the different phases of classifiers selection based on a generic framework that is formed as an outcome of reviewing prior works. Subsequently, we propose a benchmark knowledge base of 4 millions previously learned models and present extensive comparative evaluations of the prominent methods for classifiers selection based on 08 classification algorithms and 400 benchmark datasets. The comparative study quantitatively assesses the performance of algorithms selection methods along while emphasizing the strengths and limitations of existing studies.