🤖 AI Summary
This study investigates whether retrieval fusion techniques—commonly adopted in real-world retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems, such as multi-query retrieval and reciprocal rank fusion—consistently improve end-to-end answer quality under practical deployment constraints. Conducted within an enterprise knowledge-base RAG pipeline, the evaluation is performed under fixed retrieval depth, reranking budget, and latency limits. While retrieval fusion enhances initial recall, it fails to translate into improved Top-k accuracy after subsequent reranking and context truncation; notably, Hit@10 declines from 0.51 to 0.48 and incurs additional latency. These findings challenge the prevailing assumption of the default efficacy of recall-oriented fusion strategies, revealing diminishing returns in production settings where downstream processing and system constraints critically shape overall performance.
📝 Abstract
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems commonly adopt retrieval fusion techniques such as multi-query retrieval and reciprocal rank fusion (RRF) to increase document recall, under the assumption that higher recall leads to better answer quality. While these methods show consistent gains in isolated retrieval benchmarks, their effectiveness under realistic production constraints remains underexplored. In this work, we evaluate retrieval fusion in a production-style RAG pipeline operating over an enterprise knowledge base, with fixed retrieval depth, re-ranking budgets, and latency constraints.
Across multiple fusion configurations, we find that retrieval fusion does increase raw recall, but these gains are largely neutralized after re-ranking and truncation. In our setting, fusion variants fail to outperform single-query baselines on KB-level Top-$k$ accuracy, with Hit@10 decreasing from $0.51$ to $0.48$ in several configurations. Moreover, fusion introduces additional latency overhead due to query rewriting and larger candidate sets, without corresponding improvements in downstream effectiveness.
Our analysis suggests that recall-oriented fusion techniques exhibit diminishing returns once realistic re-ranking limits and context budgets are applied. We conclude that retrieval-level improvements do not reliably translate into end-to-end gains in production RAG systems, and argue for evaluation frameworks that jointly consider retrieval quality, system efficiency, and downstream impact.