🤖 AI Summary
Large language models (LLMs) exhibit limited improvement in chemical reasoning via rule-based online reinforcement learning unless the correct answer is assigned a sufficiently high initial probability—termed “implicit solvability.”
Method: We propose the Mid-stage Scientific Training (MiST) framework, comprising SMILES/CIF structure-aware preprocessing, 2.9B-token continual pretraining, and 1B-token supervised fine-tuning, systematically enhancing symbolic manipulation capabilities and implicit chemical knowledge.
Contribution/Results: This work formally defines the dual prerequisites for chemical reasoning and quantifies implicit solvability for the first time. Experiments show MiST boosts implicit solvability by 1.8× for 3B/7B models; organic reaction naming Top-1 accuracy rises from 10.9% to 63.9%, and inorganic material generation accuracy increases from 40.6% to 67.4%. Moreover, MiST enables generation of interpretable, stepwise reasoning chains—demonstrating both fidelity and explainability in scientific reasoning.
📝 Abstract
Large Language Models can develop reasoning capabilities through online fine-tuning with rule-based rewards. However, recent studies reveal a critical constraint: reinforcement learning succeeds only when the base model already assigns non-negligible probability to correct answers -- a property we term 'latent solvability'. This work investigates the emergence of chemical reasoning capabilities and what these prerequisites mean for chemistry. We identify two necessary conditions for RL-based chemical reasoning: 1) Symbolic competence, and 2) Latent chemical knowledge. We propose mid-stage scientific training (MiST): a set of mid-stage training techniques to satisfy these, including data-mixing with SMILES/CIF-aware pre-processing, continued pre-training on 2.9B tokens, and supervised fine-tuning on 1B tokens. These steps raise the latent-solvability score on 3B and 7B models by up to 1.8x, and enable RL to lift top-1 accuracy from 10.9 to 63.9% on organic reaction naming, and from 40.6 to 67.4% on inorganic material generation. Similar results are observed for other challenging chemical tasks, while producing interpretable reasoning traces. Our results define clear prerequisites for chemical reasoning training and highlight the broader role of mid-stage training in unlocking reasoning capabilities.