🤖 AI Summary
Existing GUI agent evaluation benchmarks suffer from narrow task coverage, low complexity, and coarse-grained metrics, failing to capture agents’ true capabilities in long-horizon, multi-step tasks. This paper introduces the first long-horizon evaluation framework for Android GUI agents, comprising 571 bilingual (Chinese–English) real-world tasks across 38 domains (avg. 26+ steps). It proposes a nested sub-goal-driven paradigm and a fine-grained metric—Average Task Progress (ATP)—to quantify incremental progress. The framework features a dual-mode architecture: static anomaly-preserving evaluation and dynamic milestone-based progress measurement, integrating GUI state graph modeling, automated milestone annotation, multi-path validation, and human-in-the-loop verification. Experiments reveal that state-of-the-art models achieve only 12.7% task success rate and 50.47% ATP, highlighting three fundamental bottlenecks: robustness to environmental anomalies, adaptive exploration, and long-range memory retention.
📝 Abstract
Graphical user interface (GUI) agents can substantially improve productivity by automating frequently executed long-latency tasks on mobile devices. However, existing evaluation benchmarks are still constrained to limited applications, simple tasks, and coarse-grained metrics. To address this, we introduce AndroidLens, a challenging evaluation framework for mobile GUI agents, comprising 571 long-latency tasks in both Chinese and English environments, each requiring an average of more than 26 steps to complete. The framework features: (1) tasks derived from real-world user scenarios across 38 domains, covering complex types such as multi-constraint, multi-goal, and domain-specific tasks; (2) static evaluation that preserves real-world anomalies and allows multiple valid paths to reduce bias; and (3) dynamic evaluation that employs a milestone-based scheme for fine-grained progress measurement via Average Task Progress (ATP). Our evaluation indicates that even the best models reach only a 12.7% task success rate and 50.47% ATP. We also underscore key challenges in real-world environments, including environmental anomalies, adaptive exploration, and long-term memory retention.