🤖 AI Summary
This work proposes the concept of “nano-guidance”—concise questions that can be effectively answered within 60 seconds—to address delays users often experience when seeking help with complex software through online forums. Through a mixed-methods approach combining analysis of forum data, user surveys, and expert experiments, the study demonstrates the feasibility of this approach. Findings reveal that more than half of software-related questions exhibit characteristics of “nano-questions” and can be accurately and rapidly resolved by domain experts. The research identifies key attributes of questions that enable ultra-rapid peer-to-peer assistance, offering both theoretical insights and practical guidance for designing efficient real-time collaborative support tools.
📝 Abstract
People frequently use online forums to get help from experts to answer questions about feature-rich software. However, they may have to wait minutes, hours, or even days to receive advice. We investigate the potential to leverage experts to provide quicker help. We collected over 200 questions from online forums for two feature-rich software applications and suspected a quarter were short enough to be answered in less than one minute (defined as nanoquestions). We then conducted a study with 28 experts recruited from help forums to confirm this assumption, and explore whether there was a preference between text and audio answers. For more than half of the nanoquestions participants saw, they could give advice that they believed was helpful in under 60 seconds. Finally, we collected feedback about what makes a question quick to answer to inspire the design of future tools for ultra rapid human-to-human help.