🤖 AI Summary
This study critically examines the long-standing assumption in musicology that melodic contours conform to discrete categorical types. Challenging this paradigm, the authors systematically evaluate the validity of such typologies by applying UMAP for nonlinear dimensionality reduction and the dist-dip test for multimodality to real-world datasets comprising German and Chinese folk melodies as well as Gregorian chant phrases. The robustness of their analytical pipeline is further confirmed through synthetic data experiments, which demonstrate accurate cluster recovery when ground-truth structure exists. Crucially, no statistically significant evidence of clustering emerges in the empirical data, suggesting that purported discrete contour types likely arise as methodological artifacts rather than reflecting inherent structural properties. These findings support reconceptualizing melodic contour as a continuous phenomenon, thereby questioning the foundations of traditional classification schemes.
📝 Abstract
How to describe the shape of a melodic phrase? Scholars have often relied on typologies with a small set of contour types. We question their adequacy: we find no evidence that phrase contours cluster into discrete types, neither in German or Chinese folksongs, nor in Gregorian chant. The test for clustering we propose applies the dist-dip test of multimodality after a UMAP dimensionality reduction. The test correctly identifies clustering in a synthetic dataset, but not in actual phrase contours. These results raise problems for discrete typologies. In particular, type frequencies may be unreliable, as we see with Huron's typology. We also show how a recent finding of four contour shapes may be an artefact of the analysis. Our findings suggest that melodic contour is best seen as a continuous phenomenon.