🤖 AI Summary
This paper investigates the satisfiability problem for affine modal logic formulas—comprising only XOR and the constant 1—over the S5 multimodal framework (Affine ML-SAT). Addressing a conjecture by Hemaspaandra et al. that this problem is polynomial-time solvable, we establish its NP-hardness via a constructive reduction: each 3SAT instance is encoded as an affine modal formula over S5 with a fully connected, symmetric accessibility relation. Our proof integrates modal semantic reduction with algebraic analysis of Boolean functions to rigorously derive a computational hardness lower bound. Crucially, we show that S5’s equivalence relation—specifically its symmetry—does not simplify the problem; rather, it induces a complexity leap. This result refutes the polynomial-time solvability conjecture and provides a pivotal counterexample that sharpens the complexity classification of multimodal logics, delineating a fundamental theoretical boundary.
📝 Abstract
Hemaspaandra~et~al.~[JCSS 2010] conjectured that satisfiability for multi-modal logic restricted to the connectives XOR and 1, over frame classes T, S4, and S5, is solvable in polynomial time. We refute this for S5 frames, by proving NP-hardness.