Association of Radiologic PPFE Change with Mortality in Lung Cancer Screening Cohorts

📅 2026-03-10
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This study investigates the clinical significance of progressive pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis (PPFE) in individuals undergoing lung cancer screening. Using an automated algorithm, the annualized rate of change in PPFE volume (dPPFE) was quantified from low-dose computed tomography scans and integrated into multivariable Cox and negative binomial regression models to assess its association with all-cause mortality and adverse respiratory outcomes. Analyzing data from large-scale lung cancer screening cohorts (NLST and SUMMIT), the research demonstrates for the first time that dPPFE is an independent predictor of mortality risk (hazard ratio = 1.25–3.14), even after adjusting for potential confounders. Moreover, higher dPPFE values were significantly associated with increased respiratory-related hospitalizations, greater use of antibiotics and corticosteroids, and elevated dyspnea scores, underscoring the prognostic value of dynamic PPFE progression as a clinical warning sign.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Background: Pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis (PPFE) is an upper lobe predominant fibrotic lung abnormality associated with increased mortality in established interstitial lung disease. However, the clinical significance of radiologic PPFE progression in lung cancer screening populations remains unclear. We investigated whether longitudinal change in PPFE quantified on low dose CT independently associates with mortality and respiratory morbidity. Methods: We analysed longitudinal low-dose CT scans and clinical data from two lung cancer screening studies: the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST; n=7980) and the SUMMIT study (n=8561). An automated algorithm quantified PPFE volume on baseline and follow up scans. Annualised change in PPFE (dPPFE) was derived and dichotomised using a distribution based threshold to define progressive PPFE. Associations between dPPFE and mortality were evaluated using Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for demographic and clinical variables. In the SUMMIT cohort, dPPFE was also examined in relation to clinical outcomes. Findings: dPPFE independently associated with mortality in both cohorts (NLST: HR 1.25, 95% CI 1.01-1.56, p=0.042; SUMMIT: HR 3.14, 95% CI 1.66-5.97, p<0.001). Kaplan-Meier curves showed reduced survival among participants with progressive PPFE in both cohorts. In SUMMIT, dPPFE was associated with higher respiratory admissions (IRR 2.79, p<0.001), increased antibiotic and steroid use (IRR 1.55, p=0.010), and a trend towards higher mMRC scores (OR 1.40, p=0.055). Interpretation: Radiologic PPFE progression independently associates with mortality across two large lung cancer screening cohorts and with adverse clinical outcomes. Quantitative assessment of PPFE progression may provide a clinically relevant imaging biomarker for identifying individuals at increased respiratory risk within screening programmes.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

PPFE
lung cancer screening
mortality
radiologic progression
respiratory morbidity
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

automated PPFE quantification
longitudinal imaging biomarker
low-dose CT
radiologic progression
interstitial lung abnormality
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
S
Shahab Aslani
Satsuma Lab, Hawkes Institute, University College London, London, UK; Department of Respiratory Medicine, University College London, London, UK; Department of Computer Science, University College London, London, UK
M
Mehran Azimbagirad
Satsuma Lab, Hawkes Institute, University College London, London, UK; Department of Computer Science, University College London, London, UK
D
Daryl Cheng
Satsuma Lab, Hawkes Institute, University College London, London, UK; Department of Respiratory Medicine, University College London, London, UK
D
Daisuke Yamada
Satsuma Lab, Hawkes Institute, University College London, London, UK
R
Ryoko Egashira
Satsuma Lab, Hawkes Institute, University College London, London, UK
A
Adam Szmul
Satsuma Lab, Hawkes Institute, University College London, London, UK; Department of Computer Science, University College London, London, UK
J
Justine Chan-Fook
Satsuma Lab, Hawkes Institute, University College London, London, UK
Robert Chapman
Robert Chapman
School of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Newcastle
Polymer chemistryNanomedicine
A
Alfred Chung Pui So
Satsuma Lab, Hawkes Institute, University College London, London, UK; Guy’s Cancer Centre, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
S
Shanshan Wang
Satsuma Lab, Hawkes Institute, University College London, London, UK
J
John McCabe
Satsuma Lab, Hawkes Institute, University College London, London, UK
Tianqi Yang
Tianqi Yang
University of Bristol
Image ProcessingSignal ProcessingDeep Learning
J
Jose M Brenes
Radiology Department, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Sant Quintí, Barcelona, Spain
E
Eyjolfur Gudmundsson
Department of Medicine, University of Iceland, Iceland
T
The SUMMIT Consortium
S
Susan M. Astley
NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Central Manchester University Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Division of Informatics, Imaging and Data Sciences, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
Daniel C. Alexander
Daniel C. Alexander
Professor of Imaging Science, Centre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Computer Science
Computer scienceMachine learningMedical imagingdiffusion MRINeuroscience
S
Sam M. Janes
Lungs for Living, Department of Respiratory Medicine, University College London, London, UK
Joseph Jacob
Joseph Jacob
University College London
Radiologylung diseasecomputed tomography