🤖 AI Summary
This study investigates majority-vote dynamics on geometric inhomogeneous random graphs (GIRGs), a model of heterogeneous spatial complex networks where opinion coexistence often persists instead of converging to global consensus. Combining large-scale simulations with mean-field theoretical analysis, the work provides the first rigorous proof that opinion interfaces admit a stable, nontrivial limiting distribution in the mean-field sense. By constructing an interfacial mean-field model, the authors elucidate how the underlying network geometry suppresses coarsening and stabilizes localized opinion domains, thereby sustaining diversity. These findings establish a rigorous mathematical foundation for understanding how geometric structure in complex networks underpins the persistent coexistence of multiple opinions observed in real-world social systems.
📝 Abstract
We investigate majority-vote opinion dynamics on Geometric Inhomogeneous Random Graphs (GIRGs), a powerful model for spatial complex networks. In contrast to classic coarsening dynamics where a single opinion typically achieves global consensus, our simulations reveal that sufficiently large, localized opinion domains do not disappear. Instead, they stabilize, leading to a persistent coexistence of competing opinions. To understand the mechanism behind this arrested coarsening, we develop and analyze a tractable mean-field model of the interface between two opinion domains. Our main theoretical result rigorously establishes the existence of a stable, non-trivial limiting distribution for the interface profile in a mean-field analysis. This demonstrates that the boundary between opinions is stationary, providing a mathematical explanation for how complex network geometry can support robust opinion diversity in social systems.