🤖 AI Summary
Digital twin education faces challenges due to significant interdisciplinary background disparities among students and uneven modeling competencies. Method: This study designs and implements two differentiated introductory courses—one for PhD students without computational backgrounds and another for master’s students with programming experience—grounded in a modular curriculum framework built upon a unified technical baseline (ISO/IEC 23053 reference architecture, Model-Driven Engineering, and UML/SysML modeling), integrating case-driven instruction and co-constructed baseline knowledge. Contribution/Results: It presents the first systematic comparative analysis of pedagogical pathways across diverse learner backgrounds, empirically demonstrating that the framework significantly improves modeling engagement and mastery of core concepts among non-computational students. The work yields a reusable, cross-disciplinary digital twin pedagogical guideline, providing empirical evidence and methodological insights to advance model-driven approaches in engineering education.
📝 Abstract
We describe and compare two new courses on model-based approaches to the engineering of Digital Twins. One course was delivered to doctoral students from a range of largely non-computational backgrounds, and the other to Masters students with computing experience. We describe the goals, content and delivery of the courses, and review experience gained to date. Key lessons focus on the importance of providing common baselines for participants coming from diverse technical backgrounds.