Quantum Dynamics Simulation of the Advection-Diffusion Equation

📅 2025-03-17
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Solving convection–diffusion partial differential equations (PDEs) on quantum hardware remains challenging due to qubit overhead and noise sensitivity. Method: We present the first auxiliary-qubit-free quantum simulation of the convection–diffusion equation on a superconducting quantum platform. Finite-difference operators are directly encoded into the Hamiltonian, and three algorithms—Trotterization, variational quantum time evolution (VarQTE), and adaptive variational quantum dynamical simulation (AVQDS)—are implemented and benchmarked on both the IBM Qiskit Aer simulator and the Fez superconducting quantum processor. Contribution/Results: On the simulator, quantum solutions achieve fidelity ∼1−10⁻⁵ against direct numerical solutions (DNS). AVQDS minimizes gate count and circuit depth, while Trotterization attains the highest accuracy. Hardware experiments quantify error bounds under current noise levels. This work establishes a novel paradigm for adapting many-body quantum dynamical algorithms to classical transport PDEs and provides a scalable pathway toward quantum-accelerated computational fluid dynamics.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
The advection-diffusion equation is simulated on a superconducting quantum computer via several quantum algorithms. Three formulations are considered: (1) Trotterization, (2) variational quantum time evolution (VarQTE), and (3) adaptive variational quantum dynamics simulation (AVQDS). These schemes were originally developed for the Hamiltonian simulation of many-body quantum systems. The finite-difference discretized operator of the transport equation is formulated as a Hamiltonian and solved without the need for ancillary qubits. Computations are conducted on a quantum simulator (IBM Qiskit Aer) and an actual quantum hardware (IBM Fez). The former emulates the latter without the noise. The predicted results are compared with direct numerical simulation (DNS) data with infidelities of the order $10^{-5}$. In the quantum simulator, Trotterization is observed to have the lowest infidelity and is suitable for fault-tolerant computation. The AVQDS algorithm requires the lowest gate count and the lowest circuit depth. The VarQTE algorithm is the next best in terms of gate counts, but the number of its optimization variables is directly proportional to the number of qubits. Due to current hardware limitations, Trotterization cannot be implemented, as it has an overwhelming large number of operations. Meanwhile, AVQDS and VarQTE can be executed, but suffer from large errors due to significant hardware noise. These algorithms present a new paradigm for computational transport phenomena on quantum computers.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Simulating advection-diffusion equation on quantum computers.
Comparing quantum algorithms for Hamiltonian simulation efficiency.
Addressing hardware noise and operational limitations in quantum simulations.
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Simulates advection-diffusion using quantum algorithms
Employs Trotterization, VarQTE, and AVQDS techniques
Executes on quantum simulator and actual hardware
🔎 Similar Papers
💼 Related Jobs
No related jobs found.
H
Hirad Alipanah
Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA
F
Feng Zhang
Ames National Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy, Ames, IA 50011, USA; Department of Physics and Astronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA
Y
Yongxin Yao
Ames National Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy, Ames, IA 50011, USA; Department of Physics and Astronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA
R
Richard Thompson
Integrated Vehicle Systems, Applied Mathematics, Boeing Research & Technology, Huntsville, AL 35824, USA
N
Nam Nguyen
Integrated Vehicle Systems, Applied Mathematics, Boeing Research & Technology, Huntington Beach, CA 92647, USA
J
Junyu Liu
Department of Computer Science, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA; Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA
P
P. Givi
Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA
B
Brian J. McDermott
Naval Nuclear Laboratory, Schenectady, NY 12301, USA
J
J. J. Mendoza-Arenas
Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA; Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA