Machine Learning vs. Randomness: Challenges in Predicting Binary Options Movements

📅 2025-11-19
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This study addresses the fundamental question of whether binary option price direction is predictable. Method: We systematically evaluate six machine learning models—Random Forest, Logistic Regression, Gradient Boosting, K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM)—under a unified experimental framework featuring consistent data preprocessing, rigorous hyperparameter optimization, and multiple training strategies, benchmarked against the ZeroR baseline. Contribution/Results: None of the models achieves statistically significant accuracy improvement over ZeroR (~50%), indicating that binary option price movements empirically approximate a random walk with no reproducible statistical regularities. These findings methodologically refute the feasibility of stable, supervised-learning-based profit generation in this domain. The results provide critical empirical evidence for delineating the limits of financial forecasting and underscore the need for regulatory scrutiny and investor caution regarding algorithmic trading claims targeting binary options.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Binary options trading is often marketed as a field where predictive models can generate consistent profits. However, the inherent randomness and stochastic nature of binary options make price movements highly unpredictable, posing significant challenges for any forecasting approach. This study demonstrates that machine learning algorithms struggle to outperform a simple baseline in predicting binary options movements. Using a dataset of EUR/USD currency pairs from 2021 to 2023, we tested multiple models, including Random Forest, Logistic Regression, Gradient Boosting, and k-Nearest Neighbors (kNN), both before and after hyperparameter optimization. Furthermore, several neural network architectures, including Multi-Layer Perceptrons (MLP) and a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) network, were evaluated under different training conditions. Despite these exhaustive efforts, none of the models surpassed the ZeroR baseline accuracy, highlighting the inherent randomness of binary options. These findings reinforce the notion that binary options lack predictable patterns, making them unsuitable for machine learning-based forecasting.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Machine learning struggles to predict binary options movements due to randomness
Multiple algorithms fail to outperform baseline in forecasting price changes
Binary options lack predictable patterns for effective machine learning forecasting
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Machine learning models fail to beat baseline accuracy
Tested multiple algorithms including neural networks
Binary options randomness prevents predictable patterns
💼 Related Jobs
No related jobs found.
G
Gabriel M. Arantes
Federal University of Rio Grande (FURG), Rio Grande, Brazil
R
Richard F. Pinto
Federal University of Rio Grande (FURG), Rio Grande, Brazil
B
Bruno L. Dalmazo
Federal University of Rio Grande (FURG), Rio Grande, Brazil
E
Eduardo N. Borges
Federal University of Rio Grande (FURG), Rio Grande, Brazil
Giancarlo Lucca
Giancarlo Lucca
Professor at Federal University of Pelotas (UFPEL)
V
Viviane L. D. de Mattos
Federal University of Rio Grande (FURG), Rio Grande, Brazil
F
Fabian C. Cardoso
University of Rio Verde (UniRV), Rio Verde, Brazil
R
Rafael A. Berri
Federal University of Rio Grande (FURG), Rio Grande, Brazil