🤖 AI Summary
This paper addresses portfolio optimization under distributional shift and temporal dependence, subject to Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) constraints. The core challenge lies in selecting the ambiguity set radius in Wasserstein distributionally robust optimization (DRO): excessive radii induce over-conservatism, while insufficient ones fail to mitigate regime-change risk. To resolve this, we propose a two-stage shift-aware validation framework. First, we introduce a Gaussian supremum test—novelly integrating density-ratio weighting, block multiplier bootstrap, and simultaneous confidence band upper bounds for DRO calibration. Second, we employ an efficient solver based on Lp-norm dual reformulation. Theoretically, our approach extends to non-i.i.d. financial time series. Empirically, it significantly improves the risk-return trade-off, achieving higher CVaR constraint satisfaction rates and superior sample robustness versus baselines; moreover, it automatically detects and rejects invalid configurations under data degradation.
📝 Abstract
We study portfolio selection with a Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) constraint under distribution shift and serial dependence. While Wasserstein distributionally robust optimization (DRO) offers tractable protection via an ambiguity ball around empirical data, choosing the ball radius is delicate: large radii are conservative, small radii risk violation under regime change. We propose a shift-aware Gaussian-supremum (GS) validation framework for Wasserstein-DRO CVaR portfolios, building on the work by Lam and Qian (2019). Phase I of the framework generates a candidate path by solving the exact reformulation of the robust CVaR constraint over a grid of Wasserstein radii. Phase II of the framework learns a target deployment law $Q$ by density-ratio reweighting of a time-ordered validation fold, computes weighted CVaR estimates, and calibrates a simultaneous upper confidence band via a block multiplier bootstrap to account for dependence. We select the least conservative feasible portfolio (or abstain if the effective sample size collapses). Theoretically, we extend the normalized GS validator to non-i.i.d. financial data: under weak dependence and regularity of the weighted scores, any portfolio passing our validator satisfies the CVaR limit under $Q$ with probability at least $1-β$; the Wasserstein term contributes a deterministic margin $(δ/α)|x|_*$. Empirical results indicate improved return-risk trade-offs versus the naive baseline.