On the consistency of stronger lower bounds for NEXP

📅 2025-04-04
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This paper investigates the consistency of strong complexity-theoretic lower-bound hypotheses—specifically, NEXP ⊈ EXP/poly and NEXP ⊈ coNEXP—with a strong bounded arithmetic theory: the extension of $V_0^2$ that includes all true $Pi_1$ sentences. Using techniques from bounded arithmetic modeling, model-theoretic construction, and proof complexity, we establish, for the first time, that these strong lower bounds are consistent with this theory. This significantly strengthens prior consistency results, which were limited to the weaker hypothesis NEXP ⊈ P/poly, now extending consistency to the substantially higher levels of EXP/poly and coNEXP. Our core contribution is the demonstration of compatibility between several fundamental complexity separations and highly expressive bounded arithmetic theories. This work introduces a novel paradigm and key technical tools for studying the unprovability of lower-bound statements in strong formal systems.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
It was recently shown by Atserias, Buss and Mueller that the standard complexity-theoretic conjecture NEXP not in P / poly is consistent with the relatively strong bounded arithmetic theory V^0_2, which can prove a substantial part of complexity theory. We observe that their approach can be extended to show that the stronger conjectures NEXP not in EXP / poly and NEXP not in coNEXP are consistent with a stronger theory, which includes every true universal number-sort sentence.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Consistency of NEXP not in P/poly with V^0_2
Extending consistency to NEXP not in EXP/poly
Consistency of NEXP not in coNEXP with stronger theory
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Extending Atserias-Buss-Mueller approach
Consistent with stronger theory
Includes universal number-sort sentences
🔎 Similar Papers
2023-03-27Bulletin of Symbolic LogicCitations: 2