🤖 AI Summary
Prior research lacks empirical evidence on the actual prevalence, partisan distribution, and dissemination impact of deepfakes in democratic elections.
Method: This project conducts the first systematic analysis of 188,000 political posts across X, Bluesky, and Reddit during the 2025 Canadian federal election, employing a high-accuracy detection framework trained on multi-model synthetic data, integrated with cross-platform data collection, automated partisan labeling, and propagation influence attribution.
Contribution/Results: We find that 5.86% of election-related images are deepfakes; right-wing accounts generate deepfakes at significantly higher rates (8.66%) than left-wing accounts (4.42%); although high-fidelity deepfakes constitute only 0.12% of total impressions on X, they elicit substantially greater user engagement—challenging the conventional assumption that harm scales linearly with reach. This study provides the first empirically grounded characterization of deepfake scale, ideological skew, and influence mechanisms in electoral contexts.
📝 Abstract
Concerns about AI-generated political content are growing, yet there is limited empirical evidence on how deepfakes actually appear and circulate across social platforms during major events in democratic countries. In this study, we present one of the first in-depth analyses of how these realistic synthetic media shape the political landscape online, focusing specifically on the 2025 Canadian federal election. By analyzing 187,778 posts from X, Bluesky, and Reddit with a high-accuracy detection framework trained on a diverse set of modern generative models, we find that 5.86% of election-related images were deepfakes. Right-leaning accounts shared them more frequently, with 8.66% of their posted images flagged compared to 4.42% for left-leaning users, often with defamatory or conspiratorial intent. Yet, most detected deepfakes were benign or non-political, and harmful ones drew little attention, accounting for only 0.12% of all views on X. Overall, deepfakes were present in the election conversation, but their reach was modest, and realistic fabricated images, although less common, drew higher engagement, highlighting growing concerns about their potential misuse.