Deepfakes in the 2025 Canadian Election: Prevalence, Partisanship, and Platform Dynamics

📅 2025-12-15
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Prior research lacks empirical evidence on the actual prevalence, partisan distribution, and dissemination impact of deepfakes in democratic elections. Method: This project conducts the first systematic analysis of 188,000 political posts across X, Bluesky, and Reddit during the 2025 Canadian federal election, employing a high-accuracy detection framework trained on multi-model synthetic data, integrated with cross-platform data collection, automated partisan labeling, and propagation influence attribution. Contribution/Results: We find that 5.86% of election-related images are deepfakes; right-wing accounts generate deepfakes at significantly higher rates (8.66%) than left-wing accounts (4.42%); although high-fidelity deepfakes constitute only 0.12% of total impressions on X, they elicit substantially greater user engagement—challenging the conventional assumption that harm scales linearly with reach. This study provides the first empirically grounded characterization of deepfake scale, ideological skew, and influence mechanisms in electoral contexts.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Concerns about AI-generated political content are growing, yet there is limited empirical evidence on how deepfakes actually appear and circulate across social platforms during major events in democratic countries. In this study, we present one of the first in-depth analyses of how these realistic synthetic media shape the political landscape online, focusing specifically on the 2025 Canadian federal election. By analyzing 187,778 posts from X, Bluesky, and Reddit with a high-accuracy detection framework trained on a diverse set of modern generative models, we find that 5.86% of election-related images were deepfakes. Right-leaning accounts shared them more frequently, with 8.66% of their posted images flagged compared to 4.42% for left-leaning users, often with defamatory or conspiratorial intent. Yet, most detected deepfakes were benign or non-political, and harmful ones drew little attention, accounting for only 0.12% of all views on X. Overall, deepfakes were present in the election conversation, but their reach was modest, and realistic fabricated images, although less common, drew higher engagement, highlighting growing concerns about their potential misuse.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Analyzing deepfake prevalence in the 2025 Canadian election online discourse
Examining partisan differences in sharing AI-generated political images
Assessing the reach and engagement of harmful versus benign deepfakes
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

High-accuracy detection framework for diverse generative models
Analyzed 187,778 posts across X, Bluesky, and Reddit
Measured deepfake prevalence and engagement in election context
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
V
Victor Livernoche
Mila & McGill University, Montréal, Canada
A
Andreea Musulan
Mila, IVADO & University of Montréal, Montréal, Canada
Zachary Yang
Zachary Yang
PhD Student, McGill University, School of Computer Science
Natural Language ProcessingMulti Modal Learning
J
Jean-François Godbout
Mila & University of Montréal, Montréal, Canada
Reihaneh Rabbany
Reihaneh Rabbany
Assistant Professor of Computer Science, McGill University; Canada CIFAR AI Chair, Mila
Data MiningMachine LearningGraph MiningNetwork ScienceComputational Social Science