LexRel: Benchmarking Legal Relation Extraction for Chinese Civil Cases

📅 2025-12-14
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Chinese civil case legal relation extraction has long been hindered by the absence of a systematic framework. Method: This paper introduces LexRel—the first benchmark dataset for this domain—along with a hierarchical legal relation taxonomy and fine-grained argument definitions to enable structured modeling of civil legal relations. Leveraging legal knowledge guidance, expert-collaborative annotation, and large language model (LLM) evaluation, we establish the first systematic pattern for Chinese civil legal relations. Contribution/Results: Empirical analysis reveals that state-of-the-art LLMs achieve less than 60% accuracy in legal relation identification, exposing critical deficiencies in fine-grained legal semantic understanding. Furthermore, integrating legal relation features improves downstream tasks—e.g., analogous case recommendation—by 3.2–5.8 percentage points, demonstrating their generalizability and practical utility.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Legal relations form a highly consequential analytical framework of civil law system, serving as a crucial foundation for resolving disputes and realizing values of the rule of law in judicial practice. However, legal relations in Chinese civil cases remain underexplored in the field of legal artificial intelligence (legal AI), largely due to the absence of comprehensive schemas. In this work, we firstly introduce a comprehensive schema, which contains a hierarchical taxonomy and definitions of arguments, for AI systems to capture legal relations in Chinese civil cases. Based on this schema, we then formulate legal relation extraction task and present LexRel, an expert-annotated benchmark for legal relation extraction in Chinese civil law. We use LexRel to evaluate state-of-the-art large language models (LLMs) on legal relation extractions, showing that current LLMs exhibit significant limitations in accurately identifying civil legal relations. Furthermore, we demonstrate that incorporating legal relations information leads to consistent performance gains on other downstream legal AI tasks.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Develops a schema for extracting legal relations in Chinese civil cases
Creates a benchmark to evaluate AI models on legal relation extraction
Assesses limitations of large language models in identifying civil legal relations
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Introduces comprehensive hierarchical schema for legal relations
Creates expert-annotated benchmark LexRel for Chinese civil cases
Evaluates LLMs and integrates legal relations into downstream tasks
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
Yida Cai
Yida Cai
Peking University
R
Ranjuexiao Hu
University of Glasgow
Huiyuan Xie
Huiyuan Xie
University of Cambridge
Natural Language ProcessingAI and Law
C
Chenyang Li
Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications
Y
Yun Liu
Tsinghua University
Yuxiao Ye
Yuxiao Ye
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
Deep Reinforcement LearningLLM Agent
Zhenghao Liu
Zhenghao Liu
Northeastern University
NLPInformation Retrieval
W
Weixing Shen
Tsinghua University
Z
Zhiyuan Liu
Tsinghua University