π€ AI Summary
This study reveals that large language model (LLM) agents fine-tuned via Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) exhibit highly homogeneous outputs in prediction markets, violating the independence-of-errors assumption and substantially reducing collective forecast diversity. The work identifies preference optimization as the causal mechanism underlying this emergent βmonocultureβ phenomenon and proposes cross-model diversity as a mitigation strategy. Experimental results demonstrate that an ensemble of ten DPO-tuned agents yields an effective number of independent predictors (N_eff) of only 1.4 and achieves a prediction accuracy of 67.6%, which is notably lower than that of a single untuned baseline model (70.2%). By incorporating cross-model ensembling, the correlation among prediction errors drops from 0.68 to 0.40, effectively restoring the wisdom of crowds.
π Abstract
Prediction markets rest on the independence of participant errors. As LLM agents become active traders on platforms like Kalshi and Polymarket, we ask: does this independence hold when the crowd is composed of LLMs? We find it does not. LLM agents fine-tuned with Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) share a convergent output distribution, producing pairwise error correlations of $Ο= 0.70$ and reducing ten agents to the effective forecasting power of ${\approx}1.4$ independent forecasters $N_{\text{eff}}$. This is not a scaling problem: $N_{\text{eff}}$ remains flat from $N=5$ to $N=40$, and the 10-agent market (67.6%) fails to match a single standalone agent (70.2%). Two controlled ablations isolate preference optimization as the causal driver, replicated across labs and scales ($ΞΟ= +0.24$ to $+0.46$ on identical-SFT controls at 8B and 70B). Among mitigations tested, cross-model diversity achieves the largest correlation reduction ($Ο$ from 0.68 to 0.40). As LLMs become more aligned, markets built from them become more monocultural.