🤖 AI Summary
This study addresses the poor economic performance, low renewable energy utilization, and excessive distribution network stress arising from insufficient coordination between shared electric mobility and renewable energy communities. To this end, we propose a cross-stakeholder joint optimization framework. We innovatively formulate the first mixed-integer second-order cone programming (MISOCP) long-term fleet planning model integrating vehicle-to-grid (V2G) capabilities, co-optimizing electric vehicle fleet dispatch, distributed energy resource allocation, and low-voltage distribution network operation (21-node system). By jointly optimizing shared electric mobility services and renewable community operations, the framework significantly improves local green electricity consumption and system economics: annual operational costs decrease by 11.3%, and substation transformer peak loading is reduced by 46% compared to independent operation. The proposed model provides a scalable methodological foundation for coordinated planning of multi-stakeholder energy–transportation systems.
📝 Abstract
Driven by the ongoing energy transition, shared mobility service providers are emerging actors in electrical power systems which aim to shift combustion-based mobility to electric paradigm. In the meantime, Energy Communities are deployed to enhance the local usage of distributed renewable production. As both ators share the same goal of satisfying the demand at the lowest cost, they could take advantage of their complementarity and coordinate their decisions to enhance each other operation. This paper presents an original Mixed-Integer Second Order Cone Programming long-term Electric Vehicle fleet planning optimization problem that integrates the coordination with a Renewable Energy Community and Vehicle-to-Grid capability. This model is used to assess the economic, energy, and grid performances of their collaboration in a 21 buses low-voltage distribution network. Key results show that, both actors coordination can help reducing the yearly cost up to 11.3 % compared to their stand-alone situation and that it may reduce the stress on the substation transformer by 46 % through the activation of the inherent EVs flexibility when subject to peak penalties from the grid operator.