🤖 AI Summary
This study addresses the issue of artificially generated trades on cryptocurrency exchanges, which can distort market liquidity and transparency, by proposing an anomaly detection framework that integrates complexity- and statistical structure-based features. For the first time, multifractal analysis, approximate entropy, and detrended cross-correlation analysis are jointly applied to high-frequency tick-by-tick trading data to extract deep patterns from log returns, trading volume, and trade count. The approach uncovers exchange-specific anomalies invisible to conventional price-based indicators: following mid-May 2025, Bitget exhibited a sharp surge in trade count for BTC and ETH without corresponding increases in volume or volatility, alongside characteristics of low-value, high-frequency transactions, weak cross-asset correlations, and elevated irregularity—strongly indicative of wash trading activity.
📝 Abstract
Artificial transaction generation remains an important source of potential market manipulation on cryptocurrency exchanges, as it may distort reported liquidity and reduce market transparency. This study proposes a diagnostic framework for detecting unusual trading patterns based on complexity and statistical-structure measures derived from high-frequency trade-level data. The analysis considers log-returns, trading volume, and transaction counts, using tail distributions, autocorrelation functions, multifractal characteristics, approximate entropy, and detrended cross-correlations. The methodology is applied to BTC, ETH, and XRP traded on Binance, Bitget, KuCoin, and Kraken over the period from April 1 to June 30, 2025. The results reveal a pronounced anomaly on Bitget for BTC and ETH after mid-May 2025. The number of transactions increases sharply, but there is no proportional increase in traded volume or return fluctuations. This regime is characterised by numerous low-volume trades, weaker autocorrelations, reduced multifractal organisation, higher short-pattern irregularity, and weaker cross-correlations involving the transaction-count series. These features are consistent with a noise-like component in trading activity and may indicate artificially increased transaction counts, although they do not provide direct proof of wash trading. The findings show that complexity-based indicators can be useful for detecting exchange-specific trading anomalies that remain hidden in price-based measures.