๐ค AI Summary
This study challenges the prevailing assumption that performance gains from supervised fine-tuning (SFT) in downstream tasks of speech foundation models stem primarily from methodological improvements. Instead, it systematically evaluates eight SFT variants across nine pretrained checkpoints of wav2vec 2.0, HuBERT, and WavLM on three SUPERB classification tasks, incorporating multiple random seeds to assess stability and transferability. The findings reveal that SFTโs apparent advantages are highly contingent on specific pretrained instances and random seeds, with optimal configurations showing little consistency or generalizability across checkpoints. These results suggest that most reported gains arise from favorable instanceโseed matching rather than genuine improvements in model capacity or upper-bound performance, thereby questioning the universality of SFT enhancements.
๐ Abstract
Supervised fine-tuning (SFT) is widely used to adapt self-supervised speech representations to downstream classification tasks. Small gains observed under a single pretrained checkpoint are often interpreted as method-level improvements, i.e., a higher attainable performance ceiling. We show that such conclusions are not always reliable because SFT outcomes depend strongly on the specific pretrained instance. We conduct a systematic study on 3 SUPERB classification tasks, evaluating 8 SFT variants across 9 pretrained checkpoints from wav2vec~2.0, HuBERT, and WavLM, with multi-seed repetitions on representative base-scale models. We find that the identity of the statistically indistinguishable top-group SFT recipe is often checkpoint-dependent, with limited transferability across pretrained instances. These findings suggest that many reported downstream gains reflect instance and seed dependent elicitation match, rather than universally improving the attainable performance ceiling.