HEDGEHOG: Hierarchical Evaluation of Drug Generators Through Rigorous Filtration

📅 2026-07-14
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Current evaluation metrics for molecular generation models often fail to reflect the practical viability of compounds in drug discovery, leading to a high rate of false positives. To address this limitation, this work proposes HEDGEHOG—a six-stage cascaded filtering benchmark that emulates industrial hit identification workflows by incorporating multidimensional constraints, including physicochemical properties, structural plausibility, synthetic accessibility, molecular docking, and three-dimensional conformational stability. HEDGEHOG establishes the first unified, hierarchical evaluation framework closely aligned with real-world drug discovery practices. When applied to 230,000 generated molecules, only 0.65% passed all screening stages, exposing a fundamental shortcoming of existing models in simultaneously satisfying multiple realistic constraints. This benchmark provides a more rigorous and reliable standard for assessing molecular generation methods.
📝 Abstract
Generative molecular models can support early drug discovery by proposing new candidate compounds de novo. In practice, useful candidates must balance target-relevant activity, synthetic accessibility, physicochemical properties, and other multiparameter design constraints. However, metrics commonly used to evaluate molecular generators only weakly reflect whether the generated compounds are medicinally plausible and suitable for downstream computation. This can produce false positives in model evaluation, incorrect assumptions, and inefficient use of computational resources. We introduce HEDGEHOG, a unified six-stage filtration benchmark that is inspired by industrial hit identification workflows: (i) preprocessing; (ii) physicochemical descriptor screening; (iii) structural alerts and graph-sanity checks; (iv) synthesis feasibility; (v) docking and binding affinity estimation; and (vi) three-dimensional pose and interaction checks. We evaluate 23 molecular generators across three model classes under a standardized protocol. Across 230,000 generated molecules, only 0.65% of initial molecules survive all stages. Our results expose a central limitation of current molecular generators: molecules that appear acceptable under isolated criteria rarely satisfy medicinal chemistry, synthesis, docking, and 3D pose filters simultaneously.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

molecular generators
drug discovery
evaluation metrics
medicinal plausibility
multiparameter design
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

molecular generation
multi-stage filtration
drug-likeness evaluation
synthetic feasibility
3D pose validation
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
💼 Related Jobs
Postdoctoral Fellow – AI-Driven Multi-Omics Integration for Predictive Toxicology
Pfizer
The annual base salary for this position ranges from $64,600.00 to $107,600.00. In addition, this position is eligible for participation in Pfizer’s Global Performance Plan with a bonus target of 7.5% of the base salary. We offer comprehensive and generous benefits and programs to help our colleagues lead healthy lives and to support each of life’s moments. Benefits offered include a 401(k) plan with Pfizer Matching Contributions and an additional Pfizer Retirement Savings Contribution, paid vacation, holiday and personal days, paid caregiver/parental and medical leave, and health benefits to include medical, prescription drug, dental and vision coverage. Learn more at Pfizer Candidate Site – U.S. Benefits | (uscandidates.mypfizerbenefits.com). Pfizer compensation structures and benefit packages are aligned based on the location of hire. The United States salary range provided does not apply to Tampa, FL or any location outside of the United States. Relocation assistance may be available based on business needs and/or eligibility.
Hybrid
D
Daria A. Ryabchenko
Ligand Pro, Moscow, Russia; Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Artificial Intelligence Center, Moscow, Russia
P
Pavel Gurevich
Ligand Pro, Moscow, Russia; Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Artificial Intelligence Center, Moscow, Russia
S
Shamil Kadyrov
Ligand Pro, Moscow, Russia
D
Daria Frolova
Ligand Pro, Moscow, Russia; Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Artificial Intelligence Center, Moscow, Russia
K
Kseniia Fedisheva
Ligand Pro, Moscow, Russia
S
Sergei A. Nikolenko
Ligand Pro, Moscow, Russia
Alexander Shapeev
Alexander Shapeev
Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology
Applied MathematicsNumerical AnalysisScientific ComputingMaterials Science
M
Marina A. Pak
Ligand Pro, Moscow, Russia