π€ AI Summary
Existing evaluation methods for large language models struggle to capture the high-dimensional characteristics of complex instructions encountered in real-world scenarios, leading to a misalignment between benchmark performance and practical requirements. This work proposes the first comprehensive evaluation benchmark that deeply integrates content and format constraints, logical control flow, and authentic industrial use cases. By decomposing tasks, incorporating conditional reasoning, and modeling procedural planning, the framework generates high-fidelity complex instruction samples. It moves beyond the conventional paradigm of atomized constraint composition to systematically assess a modelβs capacity to understand and execute intricate, multi-faceted instructions. Experimental results demonstrate that even state-of-the-art models exhibit significant performance gaps on this benchmark, clearly exposing the disparity between current capabilities and real-world application demands.
π Abstract
Enhancing the ability of large language models (LLMs) to follow complex instructions is critical for their deployment in real-world applications. However, existing evaluation methods often oversimplify instruction complexity as a mere additive combination of atomic constraints, failing to adequately capture the high-dimensional complexity arising from the intricate interplay of content and format, logical workflow control, and real-world applications. This leads to a significant gap between current evaluation practices and practical demands. To bridge this gap, we introduce CCR-Bench, a novel benchmark designed to assess LLMs'adherence to complex instructions. CCR-Bench is characterized by: (1) deep entanglement of content and formatting requirements in task specifications; (2) instructions that involve intricate task decomposition, conditional reasoning, and procedural planning; and (3) evaluation samples derived entirely from real-world industrial scenarios. Extensive experiments on CCR-Bench demonstrate that even state-of-the-art models exhibit substantial performance deficiencies, clearly quantifying the gap between current LLM capabilities and the demands of realworld instruction understanding. We believe that CCR-Bench offers a more rigorous and realistic evaluation framework, advancing the development of LLMs toward the next generation of models capable of understanding and executing complex tasks in industrial applications.