A Novel Distance-Based Metric for Quality Assessment in Image Segmentation

📅 2025-03-28
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Quantitative evaluation of image segmentation has long suffered from limitations: pixel-counting metrics ignore geometric structure, while distance-based measures (e.g., Hausdorff distance) lack interpretability and cross-dataset comparability. To address these issues, we propose the Surface Consistency Coefficient (SCC), a novel surface-distance-field–based metric that explicitly models segmentation errors weighted by their geodesic distance to the ground-truth surface—thereby emphasizing spatial distribution characteristics in boundary-adjacent regions. SCC achieves explicit physical interpretability and scale invariance through principled error weighting and normalization. Extensive experiments on multi-scale synthetic and real-world medical images demonstrate that SCC effectively discriminates boundary errors from interior errors, achieves superior correlation with expert clinical ratings compared to Hausdorff distance and other state-of-the-art metrics, and exhibits numerical stability and consistent cross-structure comparability.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
The assessment of segmentation quality plays a fundamental role in the development, optimization, and comparison of segmentation methods which are used in a wide range of applications. With few exceptions, quality assessment is performed using traditional metrics, which are based on counting the number of erroneous pixels but do not capture the spatial distribution of errors. Established distance-based metrics such as the average Hausdorff distance are difficult to interpret and compare for different methods and datasets. In this paper, we introduce the Surface Consistency Coefficient (SCC), a novel distance-based quality metric that quantifies the spatial distribution of errors based on their proximity to the surface of the structure. Through a rigorous analysis using synthetic data and real segmentation results, we demonstrate the robustness and effectiveness of SCC in distinguishing errors near the surface from those further away. At the same time, SCC is easy to interpret and comparable across different structural contexts.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Proposes a new metric for evaluating image segmentation quality
Addresses limitations of traditional pixel-counting error metrics
Measures spatial error distribution relative to structure surfaces
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Introduces Surface Consistency Coefficient (SCC)
Quantifies spatial error distribution near surfaces
Ensures interpretability and cross-context comparability
N
Niklas Rottmayer
Mathematics Department, RPTU University Kaiserslautern-Landau, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany
Claudia Redenbach
Claudia Redenbach
University of Kaiserslautern-Landau (RPTU), Fachbereich Mathematik
Stochastische GeometrieRäumliche StatistikBildanalyse