Memorizing is Not Enough: Deep Knowledge Injection Through Reasoning

📅 2025-04-01
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Large language models (LLMs) struggle to adapt to dynamic knowledge evolution due to their static parameterization; existing knowledge injection methods predominantly focus on memory and retrieval, lacking systematic modeling and evaluation of higher-order capabilities—namely reasoning and association. Method: We propose a four-layer knowledge injection framework—Memory → Retrieval → Reasoning → Association—formally defining hierarchical progression and establishing its mapping to injection depth. We further introduce DeepKnowledge, a synthetic benchmark enabling fine-grained, depth-aware evaluation across three knowledge evolution types: novel, incremental, and updated. Contribution/Results: Through layered modeling and multi-scenario experiments, we demonstrate that advancing to reasoning and association layers significantly enhances LLMs’ dynamic knowledge adaptation. Our framework provides principled guidance for method selection across diverse knowledge evolution scenarios, bridging a critical gap between knowledge injection and high-level cognitive capabilities.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Although large language models (LLMs) excel in knowledge recall and reasoning, their static nature leads to outdated information as the real world evolves or when adapting to domain-specific knowledge, highlighting the need for effective knowledge injection. However, current research on knowledge injection remains superficial, mainly focusing on knowledge memorization and retrieval. This paper proposes a four-tier knowledge injection framework that systematically defines the levels of knowledge injection: memorization, retrieval, reasoning, and association. Based on this framework, we introduce DeepKnowledge, a synthetic experimental testbed designed for fine-grained evaluation of the depth of knowledge injection across three knowledge types (novel, incremental, and updated). We then explore various knowledge injection scenarios and evaluate the depth of knowledge injection for each scenario on the benchmark. Experimental results reveal key factors to reach each level of knowledge injection for LLMs and establish a mapping between the levels of knowledge injection and the corresponding suitable injection methods, aiming to provide a comprehensive approach for efficient knowledge injection across various levels.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Addressing outdated information in static large language models
Developing a framework for deep knowledge injection levels
Evaluating knowledge injection depth across diverse scenarios
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Four-tier framework for systematic knowledge injection
DeepKnowledge testbed for fine-grained evaluation
Mapping injection levels to suitable methods
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
R
Ruoxi Xu
Chinese Information Processing Laboratory, Institute of Software, Chinese Academy of Sciences; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
Yunjie Ji
Yunjie Ji
Unknown affiliation
Boxi Cao
Boxi Cao
Institute of Software, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Natural Language Processing
Yaojie Lu
Yaojie Lu
Institute of Software, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Information ExtractionLarge Language Models
H
Hongyu Lin
Chinese Information Processing Laboratory, Institute of Software, Chinese Academy of Sciences
X
Xianpei Han
Chinese Information Processing Laboratory, Institute of Software, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Ben He
Ben He
Professor, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
Natural Language ProcessingInformation Retrieval
Y
Yingfei Sun
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
Xiangang Li
Xiangang Li
Unknown affiliation
speech recognitionnatural language processing
Le Sun
Le Sun
Institute of Software, CAS
information_retrievalnatural_language_processing