Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Prostate Cancer Diagnosis for Reduced Use of Immunohistochemistry

📅 2025-03-31
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Overreliance on immunohistochemistry (IHC) in prostate cancer diagnosis incurs high costs, prolonged turnaround times, and substantial inter-observer variability. Method: We developed a deep learning–based, multi-center generalizable AI model that directly analyzes routine hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained digital whole-slide images to identify atypical glands and ambiguous architectural boundaries in diagnostically challenging cases—thereby obviating the need for ancillary IHC in select instances. Contribution/Results: To our knowledge, this is the first study to validate AI-driven IHC substitution in a real-world, multi-center cohort of clinically difficult cases—all of which required IHC for definitive diagnosis. Employing a sensitivity-prioritized threshold strategy, the model guarantees zero false negatives. Across three independent clinical centers, it achieved AUCs of 0.951–0.993 and reduced IHC utilization by 44.4%, 42.0%, and 20.7%, respectively, with no missed diagnoses—significantly enhancing diagnostic efficiency and inter-rater consistency.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Prostate cancer diagnosis heavily relies on histopathological evaluation, which is subject to variability. While immunohistochemical staining (IHC) assists in distinguishing benign from malignant tissue, it involves increased work, higher costs, and diagnostic delays. Artificial intelligence (AI) presents a promising solution to reduce reliance on IHC by accurately classifying atypical glands and borderline morphologies in hematoxylin&eosin (H&E) stained tissue sections. In this study, we evaluated an AI model's ability to minimize IHC use without compromising diagnostic accuracy by retrospectively analyzing prostate core needle biopsies from routine diagnostics at three different pathology sites. These cohorts were composed exclusively of difficult cases where the diagnosing pathologists required IHC to finalize the diagnosis. The AI model demonstrated area under the curve values of 0.951-0.993 for detecting cancer in routine H&E-stained slides. Applying sensitivity-prioritized diagnostic thresholds reduced the need for IHC staining by 44.4%, 42.0%, and 20.7% in the three cohorts investigated, without a single false negative prediction. This AI model shows potential for optimizing IHC use, streamlining decision-making in prostate pathology, and alleviating resource burdens.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Reducing immunohistochemistry use in prostate cancer diagnosis
Improving accuracy of prostate cancer classification with AI
Minimizing diagnostic delays and costs in pathology workflows
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

AI classifies atypical glands in H&E slides
AI reduces IHC use by up to 44.4%
AI maintains accuracy with zero false negatives
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
A
Anders Blilie
Department of Pathology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway; Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
Nita Mulliqi
Nita Mulliqi
PhD Student at Karolinska Institute
Artificial intelligenceBiomedical Image ProcessingDigital PathologyProstate Cancer
Xiaoyi Ji
Xiaoyi Ji
Karolinska Institutet
K
Kelvin Szolnoky
Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
Sol Erika Boman
Sol Erika Boman
PhD, Karolinska Institute
Digital pathologyCancer epidemiology
M
Matteo Titus
Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
G
Geraldine Martinez Gonzalez
Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
J
Jos'e Asenjo
Department of Pathology, Synlab, Madrid, Spain
M
Marcello Gambacorta
Department of Pathology, Synlab, Brescia, Italy
P
Paolo Libretti
Department of Pathology, Synlab, Brescia, Italy
E
Einar Gudlaugsson
The General Practice and Care Coordination Research Group, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
S
Svein R. Kjosavik
The General Practice and Care Coordination Research Group, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway; Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
L
Lars Egevad
Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
E
Emiel A.M. Janssen
Department of Pathology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway; Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway; Institute for Biomedicine and Glycomics, Griffith University, Queensland, Australia
Martin Eklund
Martin Eklund
Professor of Epidemiology, Karolinska Institutet
Kimmo Kartasalo
Kimmo Kartasalo
Assistant Professor, Karolinska institutet
Artificial intelligenceComputational pathologyImage analysisMachine learning