Super Agents and Confounders: Influence of surrounding agents on vehicle trajectory prediction

📅 2026-04-03
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This work addresses the performance degradation of trajectory prediction models in highly interactive driving scenarios, where models often misuse information from surrounding traffic agents, leading to non-causal and unstable decision mechanisms. The study systematically identifies neighboring agents as confounding factors—a previously overlooked issue—and introduces an explainability analysis based on Shapley values to quantify non-robust dependencies on contextual information. To mitigate this, the authors propose a conditional information bottleneck (CIB) mechanism that adaptively compresses and filters uninformative features without requiring additional supervision. Extensive experiments demonstrate that CIB consistently enhances both prediction accuracy and robustness to perturbations across multiple datasets and model architectures.
📝 Abstract
In highly interactive driving scenes, trajectory prediction is conditioned on information from surrounding traffic participants such as cars and pedestrians. Our main contribution is a comprehensive analysis of state-of-the-art trajectory predictors, which reveals a surprising and critical flaw: many surrounding agents degrade prediction accuracy rather than improve it. Using Shapley-based attribution, we rigorously demonstrate that models learn unstable and non-causal decision-making schemes that vary significantly across training runs. Building on these insights, we propose to integrate a Conditional Information Bottleneck (CIB), which does not require additional supervision and is trained to effectively compress agent features as well as ignore those that are not beneficial for the prediction task. Comprehensive experiments using multiple datasets and model architectures demonstrate that this simple yet effective approach not only improves overall trajectory prediction performance in many cases but also increases robustness to different perturbations. Our results highlight the importance of selectively integrating contextual information, which can often contain spurious or misleading signals, in trajectory prediction. Moreover, we provide interpretable metrics for identifying non-robust behavior and present a promising avenue towards a solution.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

trajectory prediction
surrounding agents
confounders
non-causal decision-making
spurious signals
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Conditional Information Bottleneck
trajectory prediction
Shapley attribution
robustness
spurious correlation
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
D
Daniel Jost
Department of Computer Science, University of Freiburg, Germany
L
Luca Paparusso
Bosch Center for Artificial Intelligence, Renningen, Germany
Martin Stoll
Martin Stoll
TU Chemnitz
Numerical AnalysisScientific ComputingNumerical Linear AlgebraScientific Machine Learning
J
Jörg Wagner
Bosch Center for Artificial Intelligence, Renningen, Germany
Raghu Rajan
Raghu Rajan
University of Freiburg
Reinforcement LearningAutoRLAutomated Reinforcement LearningArtificial General Intelligence
J
Joschka Bödecker
Department of Computer Science, University of Freiburg, Germany