Opportunities and Barriers for AI Feedback on Meeting Inclusion in Socioorganizational Teams

📅 2026-01-16
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This study addresses how social dynamics in meetings often impede inclusive feedback and undermine organizational effectiveness. To counter this, the paper proposes the first team-oriented, AI-driven socio-technical feedback system, which employs an AI agent as a mediator combined with an induced hypocrisy paradigm to prompt participants to reflect on discrepancies between their behaviors and stated values, thereby enhancing meeting inclusivity and quality. Laboratory experiments (n=28) demonstrate that the system significantly improves equity in speaking time and perceived meeting quality. However, a field study (n=10) reveals that organizational context reshapes system usage patterns—participants primarily leveraged it for individual reflection rather than collective feedback exchange—highlighting the critical role of organizational factors in the real-world deployment and adaptation of AI-supported collaboration tools.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Inclusion is important for meeting effectiveness, which is in turn central to organizational functioning. One way of improving inclusion in meetings is through feedback, but social dynamics make giving feedback difficult. We propose that AI agents can facilitate feedback exchange by being psychologically safer recipients, and we test this through a meeting system with an AI agent feedback mediator. When delivering feedback, the agent uses the Induced Hypocrisy Procedure, a social psychological technique that prompts behavior change by highlighting value-behavior inconsistencies. In a within-subjects lab study ($n=28$), the agent made speaking times more balanced and improved meeting quality. However, a field study at a small consulting firm ($n=10$) revealed organizational barriers that led to its use for personal reflection rather than feedback exchange. We contribute a novel sociotechnical system for feedback exchange in groups, and empirical findings demonstrating the importance of considering organizational barriers in designing AI tools for organizations.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

AI feedback
meeting inclusion
socioorganizational teams
organizational barriers
feedback exchange
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

AI-mediated feedback
Induced Hypocrisy Procedure
meeting inclusion
sociotechnical system
organizational barriers
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
M
M. Houtti
Department of Computer Science & Engineering, University of Minnesota, USA
M
Moyan Zhou
Department of Computer Science & Engineering, University of Minnesota, USA
D
Daniel Runningen
Department of Computer Science & Engineering, University of Minnesota, USA
S
Surabhi Sunil
Department of Computer Science & Engineering, University of Minnesota, USA
L
Leor Porat
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, USA
Harmanpreet Kaur
Harmanpreet Kaur
University of Minnesota
Human-Computer InteractionInterpretable ML
L
Loren Terveen
Department of Computer Science & Engineering, University of Minnesota, USA
Stevie Chancellor
Stevie Chancellor
Assistant Professor of Computer Science & Engineering, University of Minnesota
Social ComputingHCIOnline Communitieshuman centered machine learning