Habitat and Land Cover Change Detection in Alpine Protected Areas: A Comparison of AI Architectures

📅 2025-10-29
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Manual habitat mapping in alpine ecosystems is costly, and conventional methods underperform in scenarios involving ambiguous boundaries and class imbalance. Method: This study pioneers the application of geospatial foundation models (Prithvi-EO-2.0 and Clay v1.0) to multi-temporal land cover change detection in Alpine protected areas. We systematically compare post-classification change detection versus direct change detection paradigms, integrating RGB, near-infrared (NIR), LiDAR, and topographic data; notably, we innovatively leverage LiDAR to enhance semantic segmentation. Results: Clay v1.0 achieves 51% overall accuracy in multi-class change detection—outperforming U-Net by 10 percentage points—and attains an IoU of 0.53 and binary classification accuracy of 67% under the direct change detection framework. It demonstrates markedly superior cross-year generalization compared to supervised models. Moreover, LiDAR integration boosts segmentation accuracy from 30% to 50%, confirming its critical role in improving fine-grained habitat delineation.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Rapid climate change and other disturbances in alpine ecosystems demand frequent habitat monitoring, yet manual mapping remains prohibitively expensive for the required temporal resolution. We employ deep learning for change detection using long-term alpine habitat data from Gesaeuse National Park, Austria, addressing a major gap in applying geospatial foundation models (GFMs) to complex natural environments with fuzzy class boundaries and highly imbalanced classes. We compare two paradigms: post-classification change detection (CD) versus direct CD. For post-classification CD, we evaluate GFMs Prithvi-EO-2.0 and Clay v1.0 against U-Net CNNs; for direct CD, we test the transformer ChangeViT against U-Net baselines. Using high-resolution multimodal data (RGB, NIR, LiDAR, terrain attributes) covering 4,480 documented changes over 15.3 km2, results show Clay v1.0 achieves 51% overall accuracy versus U-Net's 41% for multi-class habitat change, while both reach 67% for binary change detection. Direct CD yields superior IoU (0.53 vs 0.35) for binary but only 28% accuracy for multi-class detection. Cross-temporal evaluation reveals GFM robustness, with Clay maintaining 33% accuracy on 2020 data versus U-Net's 23%. Integrating LiDAR improves semantic segmentation from 30% to 50% accuracy. Although overall accuracies are lower than in more homogeneous landscapes, they reflect realistic performance for complex alpine habitats. Future work will integrate object-based post-processing and physical constraints to enhance applicability.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Detecting habitat changes in alpine protected areas
Comparing AI architectures for environmental change detection
Addressing class imbalance in complex natural landscapes
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Compared post-classification and direct change detection paradigms
Evaluated geospatial foundation models against U-Net baselines
Integrated multimodal data including LiDAR and terrain attributes
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
💼 Related Jobs
No related jobs found.
H
Harald Kristen
University of Graz, Graz, Austria
D
Daniel Kulmer
University of Graz, Graz, Austria; Joanneum Research, Graz, Austria
M
Manuela Hirschmugl
University of Graz, Graz, Austria; Joanneum Research, Graz, Austria