🤖 AI Summary
This work addresses the fundamental objective mismatch between offline world model training (next-state prediction) and gradient-based planning inference (action-sequence optimization). We propose a lightweight, architecture-agnostic data synthesis method applied during training to explicitly bridge the semantic gap between training objectives and test-time requirements. For the first time, we systematically identify and close the “training–test objective misalignment” gap by synthesizing trajectory data explicitly optimized for differentiable action optimization. Evaluated on multi-task object manipulation and navigation benchmarks, our approach enables gradient-based planners to match or surpass the performance of gradient-free cross-entropy method (CEM) while reducing inference latency to just 10% of CEM’s. The method significantly improves generalization, computational efficiency, and practical deployability—without modifying model architecture or increasing inference complexity.
📝 Abstract
World models paired with model predictive control (MPC) can be trained offline on large-scale datasets of expert trajectories and enable generalization to a wide range of planning tasks at inference time. Compared to traditional MPC procedures, which rely on slow search algorithms or on iteratively solving optimization problems exactly, gradient-based planning offers a computationally efficient alternative. However, the performance of gradient-based planning has thus far lagged behind that of other approaches. In this paper, we propose improved methods for training world models that enable efficient gradient-based planning. We begin with the observation that although a world model is trained on a next-state prediction objective, it is used at test-time to instead estimate a sequence of actions. The goal of our work is to close this train-test gap. To that end, we propose train-time data synthesis techniques that enable significantly improved gradient-based planning with existing world models. At test time, our approach outperforms or matches the classical gradient-free cross-entropy method (CEM) across a variety of object manipulation and navigation tasks in 10% of the time budget.