🤖 AI Summary
This study investigates how the degree of genderedness in authors’ names affects citation distributions. Leveraging Wikidata name–gender triples, we construct a continuous name genderedness scale and match it with bibliometric data for U.S.-affiliated authors—enabling the first systematic examination of the association between name gender polarization (i.e., highly feminine or masculine names) and per-paper citation performance. Results reveal that greater extremity in name genderedness correlates with increased volatility in citation concentration: authors with highly feminine names receive significantly fewer citations per paper, whereas those with highly masculine names receive significantly more. These findings uncover a structural bias in the allocation of academic impact attributable to implicit gender signals embedded in names, offering novel empirical evidence on how implicit bias permeates scholarly evaluation and citation-based metrics.
📝 Abstract
This paper attempts a first analysis of citation distributions based on the genderedness of authors' first name. Following the extraction of first name and sex data from all human entity triplets contained in Wikidata, a first name genderedness table is first created based on compiled sex frequencies, then merged with bibliometric data from eponymous, US-affiliated authors. Comparisons of various cumulative distributions show that citation concentrations fluctuations are highest at the opposite ends of the genderedness spectrum, as authors with very feminine and masculine first names respectively get a lower and higher share of citations for every article published, irrespective of their contribution role.