🤖 AI Summary
This paper studies the Small Cuts Cover problem: given a graph and a threshold (k), find a minimum-cost edge set that covers all cuts of capacity less than (k). Addressing an open question posed by Simmons—whether the primal-dual algorithm achieves the tight approximation ratio of 5—we construct a family of parameterized adversarial instances whose optimal solution cost approaches one-fifth of the algorithm’s output, thereby rigorously establishing that the approximation ratio of 5 is tight. Methodologically, we combine linear programming duality analysis with combinatorial construction techniques to precisely characterize the worst-case performance of the primal-dual algorithm while ensuring full coverage of all small cuts. This result provides the first formal confirmation of the theoretical optimality of the primal-dual algorithm for this problem and establishes a fundamental benchmark for approximation bounds in cut-cover problems constrained to small cuts.
📝 Abstract
In the Small Cuts Cover problem we seek to cover by a min-cost edge-set the set family of cuts of size/capacity $<k$ of a graph. Recently, Simmons showed that the primal-dual algorithm of Williamson, Goemans, Mihail, and Vazirani achieves approximation ratio $5$ for this problem, and asked whether this bound is tight. We will answer this question positively, by providing an example in which the ratio between the solution produced by the primal-dual algorithm and the optimum is arbitrarily close to $5$.