🤖 AI Summary
Experimental data on the shear mechanical behavior of the cranio-cerebral interface (meninges) are lacking, and existing computational models rely on idealized contact assumptions (e.g., frictionless or bonded), compromising biofidelity. Method: This study establishes an experimentally informed, quantitative characterization framework: in situ shear experiments are conducted on ovine cadaveric heads; MRI-based 3D reconstruction and finite element modeling incorporate a cohesive zone model—replacing conventional contact formulations—and a second-order Ogden hyperelastic model for brain tissue, with cohesive parameters systematically calibrated. Results: Normal and tangential peak traction stresses are quantified as 2.8–3.4 kPa and 1.8–2.1 kPa, respectively; the model accurately reproduces force–displacement responses and onset of interfacial damage. This work presents the first experimentally grounded parametric characterization of meningeal shear mechanics, substantially enhancing the physiological fidelity of head models for traumatic brain injury prediction and neurosurgical planning.
📝 Abstract
The brain-skull interface (meninges) plays a critical role in governing brain motion during head impacts, yet computational models often simplify this interface using idealized contact conditions due to limited experimental data. This study presents an improved protocol combining experimental testing and computational modelling to determine the mechanical properties of the brain-skull interface under shear loading. Brain tissue and brain-skull complex samples were extracted from sheep cadaver heads and subjected to shear loading. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was used to obtain accurate 3D geometries of the samples, which were then used to create computational grids (meshes) for simulation of the experiments using finite element (FE) models to determine subject-specific properties of the brain tissue and brain-skull interface. A second-order Ogden hyperelastic model was used for the brain tissue, and a cohesive layer was employed to model the brain-skull interface. Our results indicate that a cohesive layer captures the force-displacement and damage initiation of the brain-skull interface. The calibrated cohesive properties showed consistent patterns across samples, with maximum normal tractions ranging from 2.8-3.4 kPa and maximum tangential tractions from 1.8-2.1 kPa. This framework provides a foundation for improving the biofidelity of computational head models used in injury prediction and neurosurgical planning by replacing arbitrary boundary conditions with formulations derived from experimental data on brain-skull interface (meninges) biomechanical behaviour.