Semantic Temporal Single-photon LiDAR

📅 2025-12-02
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
To address the weak capability of time-resolved single-photon LiDAR (TSP-LiDAR) in open-set scenarios—particularly under low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and ultra-short acquisition times (i.e., sparse photon counts)—to recognize previously unseen targets, this paper proposes a Semantic Time-resolved Single-Photon LiDAR framework. The core innovation is an autonomously updating semantic knowledge base, which reformulates target recognition as a semantic communication process, enabling online accumulation of novel target semantics and zero-shot adaptation without model retraining. Our method integrates single-photon detection, semantic communication theory, and a lightweight neural network to achieve robust semantic-level feature extraction and matching from sparse, noisy photon data. Experiments demonstrate 89% recognition accuracy across nine previously unknown target classes—outperforming baseline methods by 23 percentage points—and significantly enhancing robustness in open environments and continual learning capability.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Temporal single-photon (TSP-) LiDAR presents a promising solution for imaging-free target recognition over long distances with reduced size, cost, and power consumption. However, existing TSP-LiDAR approaches are ineffective in handling open-set scenarios where unknown targets emerge, and they suffer significant performance degradation under low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and short acquisition times (fewer photons). Here, inspired by semantic communication, we propose a semantic TSP-LiDAR based on a self-updating semantic knowledge base (SKB), in which the target recognition processing of TSP-LiDAR is formulated as a semantic communication. The results, both simulation and experiment, demonstrate that our approach surpasses conventional methods, particularly under challenging conditions of low SNR and limited acquisition time. More importantly, our self-updating SKB mechanism can dynamically update the semantic features of newly encountered targets in the SKB, enabling continuous adaptation without the need for extensive retraining of the neural network. In fact, a recognition accuracy of 89% is achieved on nine types of unknown targets in real-world experiments, compared to 66% without the updating mechanism. These findings highlight the potential of our framework for adaptive and robust target recognition in complex and dynamic environments.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Enables open-set target recognition in TSP-LiDAR systems
Improves performance under low SNR and short acquisition times
Dynamically updates semantic knowledge without extensive retraining
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Semantic communication framework for LiDAR target recognition
Self-updating semantic knowledge base for dynamic adaptation
Improved accuracy under low SNR and short acquisition times
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
F
Fang Li
School of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518107, China
T
Tonglin Mu
School of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518107, China
S
Shuling Li
School of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518107, China
J
Junran Guo
School of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518107, China
K
Keyuan Li
School of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518107, China
J
Jianing Li
School of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518107, China
Ziyang Luo
Ziyang Luo
Salesforce AI Research
AgentsLLMsMultimodal
X
Xiaodong Fan
School of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518107, China
Y
Ye Chen
School of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518107, China
Y
Yunfeng Liu
School of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518107, China
H
Hong Cai
Research Institute of Quantum Technologies (RIQT), The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China
L
Lip Ket Chin
Research Institute of Quantum Technologies (RIQT), The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China
Jinbei Zhang
Jinbei Zhang
School of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518107, China
S
Shihai Sun