Configurable Clinical Information Extraction with Agentic RAG: What Works, What Breaks, and Why

πŸ“… 2026-06-17
πŸ“ˆ Citations: 0
✨ Influential: 0
πŸ“„ PDF
πŸ€– AI Summary
This study addresses the challenge of extracting clinically relevant information from heterogeneous electronic health records, where patient data are scattered across numerous unstructured documents and structured entries lacking document-level metadata. Conventional retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) approaches struggle to support temporal reasoning and cross-document dependency modeling under such conditions. To overcome these limitations, this work proposes ACIE, a locally deployed agent-based RAG system tailored for real-world clinical information extraction. ACIE explicitly handles missing metadata, enables cross-document reasoning, and provides traceable citations to ensure interpretability and verifiability. Evaluated on 7,326 clinical judgments, the system achieved an overall physician acceptance rate of 96.5%, with per-category acceptance rates ranging from 80% to 99%.
πŸ“ Abstract
Patient contexts span hundreds of heterogeneous documents and thousands of structured data points, yet the document-level metadata that AI systems need for retrieval and triage is absent or incomplete. Standard retrieval-augmented generation fails on this data, mishandling temporal reasoning, cross-document dependencies, and missing metadata. We deploy ACIE (Agentic Clinical Information Extraction) at University Medicine Essen: an on-premise agentic RAG pipeline that reasons over complete patient contexts and grounds every answer in source passages for clinician verification. We quantify the metadata gap, trace the architectural decisions it shaped, and evaluate extraction alongside an independent retrospective lymphoma registry study, in which nuclear-medicine physicians verify every extracted value against its cited sources. Across 7,326 judgments, clinicians accepted 96.5\% of extractions, with per-type acceptance ranging from 80\% to 99\%.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Clinical Information Extraction
Retrieval-Augmented Generation
Metadata Gap
Temporal Reasoning
Cross-document Dependencies
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Agentic RAG
Clinical Information Extraction
Metadata Gap
Temporal Reasoning
Source-Grounded Verification
πŸ”Ž Similar Papers
2024-05-27International Conference on Information and Knowledge ManagementCitations: 4
O
Osman Alperen Γ‡inar-Koraş
Institute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (IKIM), University Medicine Essen, Essen, Germany
Marie Bauer
Marie Bauer
Software Developer, Insitute for AI in Medicine, Essen
NLPMLComputational LinguisticsLinguistics
S
Sameh Khattab
Institute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (IKIM), University Medicine Essen, Essen, Germany
M
Merlin Engelke
Institute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (IKIM), University Medicine Essen, Essen, Germany
M
Moon Kim
Institute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (IKIM), University Medicine Essen, Essen, Germany
S
Stephan Settelmeier
Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
S
Shigeyasu Sugawara
Institute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (IKIM), University Medicine Essen, Essen, Germany
F
Fabian Freisleben
Institute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (IKIM), University Medicine Essen, Essen, Germany
Felix Nensa
Felix Nensa
Senior Radiologist, University Hospital Essen
machine learningartificial intelligencemedical imaginghealthcare IT
Jens Kleesiek
Jens Kleesiek
Institute for AI in Medicine (IKIM), University Hospital Essen
Medical Machine LearningMRICTBiomedical ImagingNLP