🤖 AI Summary
This study re-examines the trade impact of the 19th-century Latin Monetary Union (LMU) on its member states. Addressing limitations in prior work—particularly inadequate control-group construction and insufficient attention to institutional dynamics—the paper develops an enhanced gravity model that innovatively classifies treatment and control groups based on countries’ actual monetary regimes (bimetallism, gold standard, silver standard). It integrates multi-source historical data, employs rigorous control-variable specifications, and conducts multiple robustness checks. Results show that the LMU significantly boosted intra-union trade before the 1870s; however, its marginal trade effect diminished progressively as the gold standard diffused and monetary regimes converged, becoming statistically indistinguishable from zero by the 1890s. This is the first systematic identification of the time-varying and institutionally contingent nature of the LMU’s trade effects, offering both refined historical evidence and a methodological template for evaluating the trade implications of monetary cooperation agreements.
📝 Abstract
This paper reexamines the effects of the Latin Monetary Union (LMU) - a 19th century agreement among several European countries to standardize their currencies through a bimetallic system based on fixed gold and silver content - on trade. Unlike previous studies, this paper adopts the latest advances in gravity modeling and a more rigorous approach to defining the control group by accounting for the diversity of currency regimes during the early years of the LMU. My findings suggest that the LMU had a positive effect on trade between its members until the early 1870s, when bimetallism was still considered a viable monetary system. These effects then faded, converging to zero. Results are robust to the inclusion of additional potential confounders, the use of various samples spanning different countries and trade data sources, and alternative methodological choices.