EvoEdit: Lifelong Free-Text Knowledge Editing through Latent Perturbation Augmentation and Knowledge-driven Parameter Fusion

📅 2025-12-04
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF

career value

201K/year
🤖 AI Summary
To address post-deployment knowledge obsolescence in large language models (LLMs), existing methods—relying on structured triple-based representations and one-shot editing paradigms—fail to support natural-language-based, continual knowledge updates. This paper introduces Lifetime Free-text Knowledge Editing (LF-Edit), a novel task enabling multi-turn, sustainable knowledge injection and forgetting mitigation directly from free-text inputs. To rigorously evaluate LF-Edit, we construct MRLF-Bench, a large-scale, multi-level benchmark, and propose a cognition-inspired four-tier evaluation framework: Memory, Comprehension, Constrained Comprehension, and Reasoning. We further develop Latent Perturbation Augmentation to improve injection fidelity and introduce a knowledge-driven parameter fusion mechanism to preserve historical knowledge stability. On MRLF-Bench, our approach significantly outperforms existing baselines, achieving a superior balance between acquiring new knowledge and retaining prior knowledge.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Adjusting the outdated knowledge of large language models (LLMs) after deployment remains a major challenge. This difficulty has spurred the development of knowledge editing, which seeks to accurately and efficiently modify a model's internal (parametric) knowledge without retraining it from scratch. However, existing methods suffer from two limitations. First, they depend on structured triplets that are misaligned with the free-text nature of LLM pretraining and fail to capture the nuanced relationships among facts. Second, they typically support one-time knowledge updates, with relatively limited research on the problem of sequential or lifelong editing. To address these gaps, we propose a new task, Lifelong Free-text Knowledge Editing (LF-Edit), which enables models to incorporate updates expressed in natural language and supports continual editing over time. Despite its promise, LF-Edit faces the dual challenge of integrating new knowledge while mitigating the forgetting of prior information. To foster research on this new task, we construct a large-scale benchmark, Multi-Rank Lifelong Free-text Editing Benchmark (MRLF-Bench), containing 16,835 free-text edit requests. We further design a cognitively inspired multi-rank evaluation framework encompassing four levels: memorization, understanding, constrained comprehension, and reasoning. To tackle the challenges inherent in LF-Edit, we introduce a novel approach named EvoEdit that enhances knowledge injection through Latent Perturbation Augmentation and preserves prior information via Knowledge-driven Parameter Fusion. Experimental results demonstrate that EvoEdit substantially outperforms existing knowledge editing methods on the proposed LF-Edit task.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Adjust outdated knowledge in large language models post-deployment
Enable lifelong editing using natural language updates
Mitigate forgetting of prior information during sequential editing
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Latent Perturbation Augmentation for free-text knowledge injection
Knowledge-driven Parameter Fusion to prevent forgetting prior information
Multi-rank evaluation framework for lifelong editing benchmark
🔎 Similar Papers
2024-05-06Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language ProcessingCitations: 9
P
Pengfei Cao
Key Laboratory of Cognition and Decision Intelligence for Complex Systems, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, and the School of Artificial Intelligence, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
Z
Zeao Ji
Institute of AI and International Communication, Hunan Normal University, Changsha, China
Daojian Zeng
Daojian Zeng
Hunan Normal University
Natural language processing
J
Jun Zhao
Key Laboratory of Cognition and Decision Intelligence for Complex Systems, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, and the School of Artificial Intelligence, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
K
Kang Liu
Key Laboratory of Cognition and Decision Intelligence for Complex Systems, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, and the School of Artificial Intelligence, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China