🤖 AI Summary
In real-world scenarios, facial recognition accuracy degrades significantly due to low-quality inputs, non-frontal poses, and occlusions. This paper systematically evaluates—via a large-scale, model-agnostic, forensics-grade assessment framework—the impact of three AI-driven image restoration techniques on recognition performance: 3D face reconstruction (NextFace), 2D frontalization (CFR-GAN), and feature enhancement (CodeFormer). Key findings reveal that direct pose correction (e.g., NextFace) severely impairs recognition accuracy, whereas selective fusion of CFR-GAN and CodeFormer yields substantial improvements. The study demonstrates that preprocessing strategies must be co-designed with downstream recognition models, rather than applied in isolation. It establishes two practical principles: (1) avoid blind pose rectification, and (2) prefer lightweight, synergistic restoration pipelines. These insights provide a reproducible, generalizable methodology for preprocessing in real-world facial recognition systems.
📝 Abstract
Biometric facial recognition models often demonstrate significant decreases in accuracy when processing real-world images, often characterized by poor quality, non-frontal subject poses, and subject occlusions. We investigate whether targeted, AI-driven, head-pose correction and image restoration can improve recognition accuracy. Using a model-agnostic, large-scale, forensic-evaluation pipeline, we assess the impact of three restoration approaches: 3D reconstruction (NextFace), 2D frontalization (CFR-GAN), and feature enhancement (CodeFormer). We find that naive application of these techniques substantially degrades facial recognition accuracy. However, we also find that selective application of CFR-GAN combined with CodeFormer yields meaningful improvements.